IPC dailies - now working

BlueBella

zombieslayer25 wrote: »

Ive just gone to chat to have a look. Well there goes an hour of my sat night for me. Have my tea first then back on here to do my mags.

Is there any difference to them?

Nope - seem exactly the same! Wonder what their maintenance involved?

Blulu

Couldn't see much diff. Slight layout change. They've tarted up the menu of site options. Nothing too scary, so far.

tinktinktinkerbell

i have to say im pleased the offers you have to click through are less now

1-3 offers is the most ive seen

BlueBella

When the mags went from 3 to 5 sponsors, I emailed them and told them that I thought it made them look cheap! Like comparing The Times to the Sun lol! I had a few replies back saying that they needed more sponsors in order to continue running the competitions. I replied back saying it would put more people off entering - and everyone I know ticks the no boxes anyway. Maybe they had second thoughts - maybe they have had less entrants when they raised their sponsors from 3 to 5?

Blulu

Well done for telling 'em BlueBella :T:T:T

BlueBella

Blulu wrote: »

Well done for telling 'em BlueBella :T:T:T

LOL Yes I did! :rotfl: For example, I told 'Look' that I always bought their magazine because it looks glossy and appealing - not cheap and chatty like some that I will not mention! Then I went on to say how adding more sponsors was like adding more adverts, which made them look less appealing - almost down-grading themselves in my opinion. Like from The Times/Daily Mail to The Sun or The Star! :j

I think they were quite shocked as they sent back emails almost grovelling Maybe others had complained too or they have had a fall in entrants. Just seems strange that they have dropped down to 3, 2 or even 1 single sponsor for their comps!

And my complaining obviously never blacklisted my name, as I have won 5 comps from the dailies in the past two months!

fire**fly

BlueBella wrote: »

When the mags went from 3 to 5 sponsors, I emailed them and told them that I thought it made them look cheap! Like comparing The Times to the Sun lol! I had a few replies back saying that they needed more sponsors in order to continue running the competitions. I replied back saying it would put more people off entering - and everyone I know ticks the no boxes anyway. Maybe they had second thoughts - maybe they have had less entrants when they raised their sponsors from 3 to 5?

BlueBella wrote: »

LOL Yes I did! :rotfl: For example, I told 'Look' that I always bought their magazine because it looks glossy and appealing - not cheap and chatty like some that I will not mention! Then I went on to say how adding more sponsors was like adding more adverts, which made them look less appealing - almost down-grading themselves in my opinion. Like from The Times/Daily Mail to The Sun or The Star! :j

I think they were quite shocked as they sent back emails almost grovelling Maybe others had complained too or they have had a fall in entrants. Just seems strange that they have dropped down to 3, 2 or even 1 single sponsor for their comps!

And my complaining obviously never blacklisted my name, as I have won 5 comps from the dailies in the past two months!

:T:T:T brilliant BlueBella, well done telling them & big thanks for doing so :A:T:T:T

BlueBella

Ahhh Thank you fire***fly too - you share some great comps - you deserve a big hand shake too ! X