We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Regulated -vs- Non regulated Hire Purchase

GKWsailing
Posts: 2 Newbie
in Loans
My question is firstly whether a Hire Purchase Agreement in the name of a limited company is excluded from being regulated by the Consumer Credit Act, as the lender's solicitor insists.
I bought a car in 2004 with a loan from Black Horse Finance.
The loan amount was £17,250 in the name of my limited company with a personal indemnity given by me.
I signed a "Non-regulated Hire Purchase agreement" but the next day I was contacted by Black Horse and told that it was not the correct agreement and they would send me a "Regulated" agreement in the post. I have the unsigned copy of this regulated agreement.
I have paid £18,600 but fell into arrears last year. The car was repossessed without a court order and Black Horse are sueing for the balance of £6,000.
Of course Black Horse now denies the existence of the second "regulated" agreement and produces only their copy of the signed non-regulated agreement.
I believe that if "regulated" then they had no right to reposess without a court order and that I may be due refund of my repayments.
I bought a car in 2004 with a loan from Black Horse Finance.
The loan amount was £17,250 in the name of my limited company with a personal indemnity given by me.
I signed a "Non-regulated Hire Purchase agreement" but the next day I was contacted by Black Horse and told that it was not the correct agreement and they would send me a "Regulated" agreement in the post. I have the unsigned copy of this regulated agreement.
I have paid £18,600 but fell into arrears last year. The car was repossessed without a court order and Black Horse are sueing for the balance of £6,000.
Of course Black Horse now denies the existence of the second "regulated" agreement and produces only their copy of the signed non-regulated agreement.
I believe that if "regulated" then they had no right to reposess without a court order and that I may be due refund of my repayments.
0
Comments
-
I bought a car in 2004
You've had the car for 8 years? Surely the loan will be paid off long before now. Are you claiming that you might be entitled to have had the use of a £17 grand car free for 8 years because of confusion over the type of loan agreement? I think you need to consult your own solicitor.I used to think that good grammar is important, but now I know that good wine is importanter.0 -
The question was whether this should or could have been a regulated agreement.
I was not asking for your judgement, but thank you for your prompt reply.0 -
Regulated loans are loans below £25k. You took your loan out in 2004.
Now I know that the level for regulated loans used to be £15k in 1991, but when it increased to £25k I have been unable to find out. I think you need to do some investigative work and find out when it changed."There are not enough superlatives in the English language to describe a 'Princess Coronation' locomotive in full cry. We shall never see their like again". O S Nock0 -
It was written in the name of the limited company so it is ALWAYS unregulated.
So no it could never have been an CCA regulated deal.0 -
It's called the Consumer Credit Act for a reason.
Limited companies are not protected under it.
See this rather useful piece for more info.0 -
I may be due refund of my repayments.
Well, (and at the risk of sounding judgemental), in your dreams!I used to think that good grammar is important, but now I know that good wine is importanter.0 -
Yup, dereg as it was signed with a limited company.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 256K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards