MSE News: Anger at Newcastle United's Wonga sponsorship deal

24

Comments

  • JamesK10
    JamesK10 Forumite Posts: 407 Forumite
    edited 10 October 2012 at 1:13PM
    I'm sick and tired of the fake moralising that goes on with this and football in general. One UK company that already sponsored two clubs in England and Scotland is taking over for another one and putting money into the grass roots of an English club. Neither firm is all that popular but Virgin's been around a lot longer so they seem to be tolerated. I'd rather the money went there than to sponsor CSI on Channel 5.

    Given that JJB have gone into administration, if Sportsdirect are still going as a British business then good luck to Ashley. The day he says "I've had it" and flogs the club to some rich foreigner, or an American who dumps all the debt from their American non-football clubs into your club, fans will regret that even more.

    Fallenwiccan has the right idea, Investec sponsor my lot, Spurs, and they have another sponsor depending on the competition, if they're getting money in from a South African bank why spend £40 of your own cash on the shirt, I'm not going to.
  • Nath4n
    Nath4n Forumite Posts: 2,159
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    To be honest, what's significantly worse about this sponsorship as opposed to the string of gambling (betting and casino) firms which sponsor large clubs around the world?

    Both pay day lending and gambling require financial awareness and responsibility but both can equally lead to financial ruin if used irresponsibly.

    I don't think it is right to demonise one for a sponsorship deal, but not the other.
  • Taiko
    Taiko Forumite Posts: 2,711
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    Newcastle fan, and couldn't care less about who sponsors the team. Support the team, not the finance behind it.
  • rdwarr
    rdwarr Forumite Posts: 6,159
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Photogenic
    Forumite
    So it's wrong to be sponsored by Wonga who offer a service to those in need (unless you abuse it) but OK to be sponsored by the major banks who brought the World economy to its knees with their dodgy dealings?
    Can I help?
  • A.Jones
    A.Jones Forumite Posts: 508 Forumite
    I hope Nick Forbes, leader of Newcastle City Council, would also fight against Wonga if they, for example, wanted to relocate to Newcastle bringing jobs to the area.
  • Twopints
    Twopints Forumite Posts: 1,769
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    Could be worse, could be sponsored by a really dodgy financial institution like Northern Rock.
    Not even wrong
  • Brian_Steele
    Brian_Steele Forumite Posts: 96 Forumite
    If you can't get a loan elsewhere - and the banks certainly aren't interested - then people like Wonga are a lifeline.

    Their fees are high, because they are dealing in sub-prime and will have a lot of defaulters. Most people who use them are glad to be able to get anything from anyone.

    Anyway, the APR they choose is a red herring. Several thousand percent just means it costs you £25 to borrow a few hundred quid for a few days, extrapolated to a full year. It's just a charge for the service and reflecting that as an APR is only done because the law demands it.
  • Percy1983
    Percy1983 Forumite Posts: 5,244
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    If you can't get a loan elsewhere - and the banks certainly aren't interested - then people like Wonga are a lifeline.

    Their fees are high, because they are dealing in sub-prime and will have a lot of defaulters. Most people who use them are glad to be able to get anything from anyone.

    Anyway, the APR they choose is a red herring. Several thousand percent just means it costs you £25 to borrow a few hundred quid for a few days, extrapolated to a full year. It's just a charge for the service and reflecting that as an APR is only done because the law demands it.

    I do agree the APR's don't mean much, If they charged 15% the interest over a week or month wouldn't cover the admin costs to actually give out the loan.

    I will say I ahve never just them myself but if it game to a one off situation I would rather give them £20 than have direct debts bouncing all over and ending up with more than £20 worth of fees.
    Have my first business premises (+4th business) 01/11/2017
    Quit day job to run 3 businesses 08/02/2017
    Started third business 25/06/2016
    Son born 13/09/2015
    Started a second business 03/08/2013
    Officially the owner of my own business since 13/01/2012
  • whatmichaelsays
    whatmichaelsays Forumite Posts: 2,927
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    edited 10 October 2012 at 3:43PM
    So there is outrage at Newcastle's new sponsor, a business that asks people who borrow £100 for a week to pay £112.78 back.

    Where was the outrage at their previous sponsor, Northern Rock - a bank that tied thousands into 125% mortgages and years of negative equity? A bank that gambled everything (and lost) on the wholesale money markets rather than acting like a responsible bank and growing through acquiring deposits.

    Why are local MPs, who were happy for Britain to rack up trillions in personal debt, suddenly decrying this deal?

    Where's the anger at Barclay's the sponsor of the Premier League, who charge £44 for exceeding an overdraft for three days (in effect, making them more expensive than a pay-day lender)?

    PDL Co-bashing should be a sport in itself.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • Dirk_Gently_2
    Dirk_Gently_2 Forumite Posts: 281
    Ninth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    Ah, the usual round of smug people glibly saying "ah, well people should know what they're getting into, it's all in the small print."

    That's true, but all of the PDL companies target their marketing at the more desperate and/or stupid people in the extremes of society, with an aim to hook these people in so they're tied week after week, revolving or extending the same loan every week and paying more and more interest. Wonga can rest safe safe in the knowledge that if people screw up (and 16% of their customers do!) then the resulting interest and payment charges are horrendous - and that's where the bulk of their money comes from.

    PDL companies do have a role - but they need to be properly regulated, because at the moment they get away with targeting their adverts at the vulnerable and making their financial position much, much worse.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 339K Banking & Borrowing
  • 248.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 447.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 230.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 171.1K Life & Family
  • 244.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards