We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Employed and self-employed; sole-trader or ltd company for self-employed work?

13»

Comments

  • It seems that the Limited Company is the winner.

    I much prefer being a sole trader myself, and doing my own tax returns but the income is not high and my affairs are very simple.

    As for IR35, I think it was introduced by the old Inland Revenue many many years ago when people in my then profession of computer programming abused the limited company option. They were full employees, then they created limited companies just to reduce their tax liability and carried on working for the same company 9-5 as employees in all but name. They had the benefits of a limited company without any of the risks: there was so much demand for their services from the 'employer' that they did not have to look for clients or have any time between assignments.

    Wasn't the real problem that the tax man did not like Mr & Mrs Arctic Systems being directors of the company, thus getting two lots of personal allowances and 20% tax bands in on the act? It was not just a matter of paying less National Insurance and claiming a bit more on expenses.
    Personally I would think that the self reliance of those who survived as self employed would mean less claims on social security in the long run.

    Now we have more of the problem, where ONE partner exceeding £50k, reduces the child allowance for the couple. Is this yet another reason for incorporating to create two £49,999 incomes?

    The higher effective tax rates being imposed are definitely reducing the
    the country's output from high value added individuals and their ability to create work for the young and unqualified.
  • Hey - being Limited is useful for a number of reasons. I use and adore the guys at Crunch (I have a code which gets you a free amazon voucher for joining if you want it feel free to PM me) but they do have a new free service as well. I put my invoices and expenses into the online system and they do everything else. I can phone or email them during working hours to ask questions and get them to check things for me. I am sure that would include a contract for IR35. They have helped me with a lot of stupid questions in the past. And I mean a lot...

    IR35 has a number of requirements. You have to meet more than one to be considered actually employed - It has to be ongoing. They pay you sick/holiday pay or similar benefits which are unusual for contractors. They can tell you when and what to work on rather than you deciding. You work for only them. And so on and so forth. But what you are doing sounds like a long contract and the paperwork should reflect it. I think you are right to take it into account, but probably don't need to worry.

    :)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.