We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Sacked for having an accident!

My nephew has been in employment with a building firm for about 9 months and recently had an accident at work.
He was told by his foreman to climb onto a roof to repair a chimney and he did this and promptly fell :( He has only bruised himself luckily and had one day off. On returning to work he has been hauled into the office and told he needs to resign or he will be sacked.
Does anybody know if there is any protection due to the health and safety issue?
Another foreman has taken pictures which show there was no scaffolding up (it was ordered as soon as nephew fell) and the nephew has stated he will not pursue a compensation claim. However he would not sign the accident book until it states the truth - that he was told to go up on the roof without safety equipment.
Only a couple of weeks ago he was being told how valuable he has become :mad:
«1

Comments

  • He has been there less than a year so they can dismiss him without having to give any justification
  • ohreally
    ohreally Posts: 7,525 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    embob74 wrote: »
    Does anybody know if there is any protection due to the health and safety issue?

    Statutory protection would only apply had he raised concerns/ reported non-compliance and subsequently had his employment terminated as a result.
    Don’t be a can’t, be a can.
  • It sounds like the company are scared. They can get into a lot of trouble for not having correct safety procedures in place, there should have been scaffolding. He could have been seriously injured from their mistake.

    He definitely shouldn't sign anything. If they sack him, definitely seek legal advice and seek compensation, there are some reputable 'accident at work' companies that offer free legal advice and claim legal expenses from the other side.
  • t0rt0ise
    t0rt0ise Posts: 4,511 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    He definitely shouldn't sign anything. If they sack him, definitely seek legal advice and seek compensation, there are some reputable 'accident at work' companies that offer free legal advice and claim legal expenses from the other side.
    On what grounds are you suggesting he has a claim? He can't claim for injury as he wasn't injured, bar a few bruises and one day off work.
  • t0rt0ise wrote: »
    On what grounds are you suggesting he has a claim? He can't claim for injury as he wasn't injured, bar a few bruises and one day off work.

    I don't know, I'm not sure how these things work. I'm just suggesting that he seeks legal advice to see if there is a claim to be made. Surely his employer can't do this without repercussions. It's a disgrace if they get away with treating him like this.
  • Buzby
    Buzby Posts: 8,275 Forumite
    He would also be expected to exercise his own judgement - he wasn't forced to go on the roof, but what makes no sense is why he was asked to resign, unless they are asserting he broke their rules.

    As others note, he needs to be there a year before useful protections kick in.
  • embob74 wrote: »
    However he would not sign the accident book until it states the truth - that he was told to go up on the roof without safety equipment.
    Only a couple of weeks ago he was being told how valuable he has become :mad:

    Health and Safety at Work is a TWO WAY STREET. If the employee knows it is dangerous and that safety equipment isn't there which should be, THEY SHOULD REFUSE TO DO IT.

    He knew that the scaffolding etc required wasn't there yet still carried on. He is as liable as his employers.
  • I don't know, I'm not sure how these things work. I'm just suggesting that he seeks legal advice to see if there is a claim to be made. Surely his employer can't do this without repercussions. It's a disgrace if they get away with treating him like this.

    An employee is as responsible for his own wellbeing as an employer. If he knew it wasn't right he shouldn't have done it.
  • ohreally
    ohreally Posts: 7,525 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The employer has duties placed on him, these can't be delegated away.

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/735/schedule/5/made - Requirements for personal fall protection

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/735/regulation/6/made - Avoidance of risks from work at height

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/37/section/2 - It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees
    Don’t be a can’t, be a can.
  • sniggings
    sniggings Posts: 5,281 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    t0rt0ise wrote: »
    On what grounds are you suggesting he has a claim? He can't claim for injury as he wasn't injured, bar a few bruises and one day off work.

    so that is an injury :rotfl:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.