We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

New RHI Consultation paper

Comments

  • rogerblack
    rogerblack Posts: 9,446 Forumite
    Barking mad.
    I need to read in more detail, but there are major issues that are seemingly ignored.
    Install a heatpump, running off electricity, which pays back after (say) 10 years, and continues using fossil fuels thereafter, and which will need (likely) a major refurbishment or replacement costing several thousand pounds in 15 or 20 years at most.

    Versus installing insulation to harder to insulate properties, which is in many cases unsubsidised, and could provide lasting savings for the life of the structure.

    Then there are the major issues around 'certified' kit being enormously more expensive than that available retail.

    I note I paid around 400 total for a 1.5kW solar-thermal array.
    For MCS approved - this easily adds another zero on.

    This is looking like the enormously expensive FIT debacle again.
  • zeupater
    zeupater Posts: 5,398 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    rogerblack wrote: »
    Barking mad.
    I need to read in more detail, but there are major issues that are seemingly ignored.
    Install a heatpump, running off electricity, which pays back after (say) 10 years, and continues using fossil fuels thereafter, and which will need (likely) a major refurbishment or replacement costing several thousand pounds in 15 or 20 years at most.

    Versus installing insulation to harder to insulate properties, which is in many cases unsubsidised, and could provide lasting savings for the life of the structure.

    Then there are the major issues around 'certified' kit being enormously more expensive than that available retail.

    I note I paid around 400 total for a 1.5kW solar-thermal array.
    For MCS approved - this easily adds another zero on.

    This is looking like the enormously expensive FIT debacle again.
    Hi

    What 1.5kW.t system do you have ? .... I was under the impression that £400 would just about be a reasonable cost for a small DIY panel but wouldn't cover controller, pipework, pump, cylinder/cylinder coil, sensors, connectors, wiring, antifreeze, expansion vessel ... then there's the scaffolding and the pipe insulation and the roofbolts, the labour and .....

    HTH
    Z
    "We are what we repeatedly do, excellence then is not an act, but a habit. " ...... Aristotle
    B)
  • Martyn1981
    Martyn1981 Posts: 15,695 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    zeupater wrote: »
    Hi

    What 1.5kW.t system do you have ? .... I was under the impression that £400 would just about be a reasonable cost for a small DIY panel but wouldn't cover controller, pipework, pump, cylinder/cylinder coil, sensors, connectors, wiring, antifreeze, expansion vessel ... then there's the scaffolding and the pipe insulation and the roofbolts, the labour and .....

    HTH
    Z

    Here are some kits and prices. Personally I've run out of room, and have a combi. Oh well!

    http://www.navitron.org.uk/product.php?proID=86

    Mart.
    Mart. Cardiff. 8.72 kWp PV systems (2.12 SSW 4.6 ESE & 2.0 WNW). 28kWh battery storage. Two A2A units for cleaner heating. Two BEV's for cleaner driving.

    For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.
  • zeupater
    zeupater Posts: 5,398 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Martyn1981 wrote: »
    Here are some kits and prices. Personally I've run out of room, and have a combi. Oh well!

    http://www.navitron.org.uk/product.php?proID=86

    Mart.
    Hi

    Thought that £400 was a little low, even for DIY .... ;)

    Z
    "We are what we repeatedly do, excellence then is not an act, but a habit. " ...... Aristotle
    B)
  • so will a wood pellet boiler be wa wothwhile investment over say 20 years or not

    confused or what?

    frugal:)
    Early retired in summer 2018 and loving it
  • Cardew
    Cardew Posts: 29,064 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Rampant Recycler
    How long before the 'Cowboys' currently selling inflated price solar PV installations move in to this area?
  • Cardew wrote: »
    How long before the 'Cowboys' currently selling inflated price solar PV installations move in to this area?

    They'll have to be very creative with the figures! (not that that will stop them).

    My proposed system solar thermal system came in at £6.2k, with, iirc, a one-off £300 premium payment and, according to the consultation document, a rhi annual payment of about £120, making resonable assumptions.

    I wonder if, unlike the fit, many will be put off saving the planet by the low cash returns from solar thermal?
  • zeupater
    zeupater Posts: 5,398 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 21 September 2012 at 4:34PM
    They'll have to be very creative with the figures! (not that that will stop them).

    My proposed system solar thermal system came in at £6.2k, with, iirc, a one-off £300 premium payment and, according to the consultation document, a rhi annual payment of about £120, making resonable assumptions.

    I wonder if, unlike the fit, many will be put off saving the planet by the low cash returns from solar thermal?
    Hi

    What spec system would the £6.2k provide ? ... seems expensive, but I also had quotations at well above this level ...

    The main issue, as I see it, with the RHI is that the unmetered payments would be based on the estimate on the MCS certificate which is based on a flawed BRE hot water provision calculation (BRE flawed calculation ? ... where have I seen that written before ... :D;)) ... it simply seems that no matter what technology you have on the roof, or what size it is, the amount of hot water it can provide is limited to a percentage of the assessed hot water usage demand for the property according to BRE .... (Just knowing this, I'm not sure whether I need to get a new life or the BRE need to get new people endowed with a little common-sense ... but I'll hazard a guess ... :D;))

    HTH
    Z
    "We are what we repeatedly do, excellence then is not an act, but a habit. " ...... Aristotle
    B)
  • why is the incentive figure so much lower for biomass

    this is really the only clear option for me to replace oil but may not bother now
    Early retired in summer 2018 and loving it
  • nrmacg
    nrmacg Posts: 8 Forumite
    there is a new system using an aluminium on roof panel, through which a refrigerant gas is run, that will provide 100% of the hot water needs.

    The price is similar to conventional solar thermal, about £ 5,000, but the performance much better as the existing technology delivers 70% of hot water requirements over the year, AT BEST.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.