We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Removal of affordable housing won't work
Options
Comments
-
I would welcome stop building shared ownership and shared equity on sites. Less first time time buyers would getting on these so called affordable schemes which are in reality con.
If they don't start building we should introduce a land bank tax.:exclamatiScams - Shared Equity, Shared Ownership, Newbuy, Firstbuy and Help to Buy.
Save our Savers
0 -
I would welcome stop building shared ownership and shared equity on sites. Less first time time buyers would getting on these so called affordable schemes which are in reality con.
If they don't start building we should introduce a land bank tax.
Totally agree. A friend bought a (very nice) Shared Ownership house in 2006 and I think he now bitterly regrets it.
I'm registered for Choice Based Lettings and along with the rentals I can bid for I get to see details of some of the resale Shared Ownership houses. Some of these have lingered on there for many months.Generation Rent0 -
I would never consider a new build purely due to the housing association element that is built on the same development.Mortgage overpayment01/05/11 - 31/12/2011£5000/£7000End of 2012 target£84000
-
18 percent of all Minnesota homes were in the "lower income" bracket and paid 30 percent of their income on housing. Little money is left over for them to enjoy such other such necessities. I don't live in Minnesota, but I can relate.0
-
chewmylegoff wrote: »And cala made a profit of £11m from a turnover of £250 million, a margin of 4%. The year before it managed £2 million off a turnover of £210 million, a margin of less than 1%. Whilst their profit is up by 500% it's hardly stellar stuff. They made a loss of nearly £30 million in 2010...
A £27.1 million loss before tax to be exact. In fact Cala's financial position at the time was such that it was bust. Which is why it only survived because Lloyds Bank agreed to do a debt-for-equity swap.
Dead businesses who are given a second chance at life are supposed to get their act in order, and a 500% increase in profit is exactly what you'd hope to see.Graham_Devon wrote: »...
Construction companies are one of the areas who are doing extremely well right now ..
They're doing 'extremely well right now' compared to how they were doing in 2009-20010. They're still doing extremely badly compared to how they were doing before then.0 -
Regulated self build has to be the way forward. Over 80 percent of houses built in germany are self build. Good for the loocal economy, local trade and people get the house they want for about a third less, plus no cat to be paid on materials for a self builder.0
-
Regulated self build has to be the way forward. Over 80 percent of houses built in germany are self build. Good for the loocal economy, local trade and people get the house they want for about a third less, plus no cat to be paid on materials for a self builder.
a more complete picture would be good0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards