Ppi & cdl?

InsideInsurance

pheonixrising21 wrote: »

Not being sure its on the loan is reason enough to believe it may have been mis-sold isn't it? .

That can be more a sign of bad memory or not bothering to read what your agreeing to etc

Janie4Now

KAZ005 wrote: »

Thank you Janie4Now,
Thats really encouraging news, have you heard of any success in court then using a 'Four Party' argument?
We have written twice to Barclays Partner Finance and they say their decision is made but i'm wondering whether we should write to them one more time with this new information or go straight to the ombudsman.

No personal experience though I did study law and what Barclays have told you just feels wrong.....and the government site I looked at certainly seems to say that in these sort of cases the finance company is jointly liable! They actually quote cases on the site so you should be able to use those.

I would be tempted to write to Barclays one more time directing them to the case law and saying that failure to reimburse you will lead to a referral to the Ombudsman. You should note, however, that their duty is to either refund or to provide alternative training and this seems to be at their discretion; the training, though, must be of similar standing and must not cause unnecessary problems for the trainee - this is also on the site I posted

Good luck.....let us know how you get on!

~Brock~

How many different threads are going on in here?

@KAZ005 could you possibly think about starting your own thread rather than hi-jacking this one?

Janie4Now

~Brock~ wrote: »

How many different threads are going on in here?

@KAZ005 could you possibly think about starting your own thread rather than hi-jacking this one?

Sorry, Brock....you're quite right

@KAZ005.....either start a new thread or PM me if you have any further problems.... though I think I've said about as much as I can anyway!

Apples2

KAZ005 wrote: »

'Brock' I'll keep my problems to myself in future rather than pick up snotty messages

Well you're a little charmer aren't you? :rotfl::rotfl:

kangaroo321

Given the large number of disputes that arise with banks and lenders I feel that the role of the ombudsman is very important

Apples2

kangaroo321 wrote: »

Given the large number of disputes that arise with banks and lenders I feel that the role of the ombudsman is very important

Almost as important as the :spam: button.

~Brock~

KAZ005 wrote: »

'Brock' I'll keep my problems to myself in future rather than pick up snotty messages

No need to keep your problems to yourself, just simply start a new thread each time. It's not that difficult a concept is it?

Apples2 wrote: »

Well you're a little charmer aren't you? :rotfl::rotfl:

Exactly what I thought, especially when I thought I was actually being quite polite. Oh well, takes all sorts......