We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Why exactly are houses so expensive?

1246713

Comments

  • There is money out there - fair enough I don't have it but doesn't mean the next doesn't
  • Carl31
    Carl31 Posts: 2,616 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    my understanding is that for every house bought there is a seller.

    so for everyone paying silly prices there is some-one receiveing silly income

    the total amount of money floating around in the economy is therefore the same

    the problem with our economy is an excess of savings.

    If everyone was earning silly income to match the silly prices we would have no problem.

    I mentioned that a correction needs to happen. A correction doesnt mean prices have to bottom out, if wages were to rise then that would also provide a soloution. But, considering the fact we are in the longest recession in decades, the likelyhood of that happening is pretty remote, so what else will give.

    There was a report on the news the other day that there is, apparently, 750k empty properties in the uk. So its not even a problem of lack of properties

    I dont know how true that report is, but i imagine its someway indicative
  • There is money out there - fair enough I don't have it but doesn't mean the next doesn't

    (1) maybe you should change your username then?;
    (2) speaking of which, your posts are starting to read a lot like Sibley's.
    FACT.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    the problem with our economy is an excess of savings.

    Yes, what we need is for those with savings to invest most of it in bricks and mortar, or at least go on a couple of luxury holidays and buy a 60" TV.

    And what have they got to lose ? In the event they are ill, out of work or retire, they get extra state benefits because they have less savings.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    LOL.

    This place gets better.


    do you not believe that when you go to your building society and 'deposit' 1,000 into your savings account that a debt of exactly the same amount is created in the BS a/c?

    do you not believe that when some-one borrows 1,000 from a bank, that a credit of exactly that amount of 1,000 is created?


    do you not believe that the sum of all saving and all debts is zero?

    do you not believe that an debt problem must exactly equal a savings problem.

    if debt is evil then so must be savings

    so we suffer from an deficiency of demand due to an excessive amount of savings; which is exactly the same thing as saying there is too much debt.

    the interesting issue is why there is too much savings but that wouldn't make much of an interesting headline and would require people to know a little economics
  • (1) maybe you should change your username then?;
    (2) speaking of which, your posts are starting to read a lot like Sibley's.

    There is money out there just because one person doesn't have it doesn't mean the next doesn't
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    DervProf wrote: »
    Yes, what we need is for those with savings to invest most of it in bricks and mortar, or at least go on a couple of luxury holidays and buy a 60" TV.

    And what have they got to lose ? In the event they are ill, out of work or retire, they get extra state benefits because they have less savings.


    well while sarcasm does have a place, personally I would prefer that the money was invested in productive infrastructure projects although over time we need to address the underlying causes.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    In the same time that houses have increased 8,000% in value, eggs have increased 2,000%, bread 1,983%, milk 1,125%.

    I ,make it that prices have increased by 157% (63k to 162k) between 1989 and 2012 so most of that rise must have landed in the laps of the late 80's boomers, I wonder if they squealed as much when it was their turn to buy?
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    do you not believe that when you go to your building society and 'deposit' 1,000 into your savings account that a debt of exactly the same amount is created in the BS a/c?

    do you not believe that when some-one borrows 1,000 from a bank, that a credit of exactly that amount of 1,000 is created?


    do you not believe that the sum of all saving and all debts is zero?

    do you not believe that an debt problem must exactly equal a savings problem.

    if debt is evil then so must be savings

    so we suffer from an deficiency of demand due to an excessive amount of savings; which is exactly the same thing as saying there is too much debt.

    the interesting issue is why there is too much savings but that wouldn't make much of an interesting headline and would require people to know a little economics

    and better, and better....
  • House prices need to remain high because of the 'feelgood factor' that voters have when this happens. It gives people the illusion of being rich even when they have it all tied up in unspendable property. Therefore, governments and the BoE do all they can to ensure that house prices do not fall - and when they do only temporarily and by small amounts. It has more to do with politics than economics.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.