We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Employed or self employed?

2»

Comments

  • CTA_2
    CTA_2 Posts: 120 Forumite
    What about the right of substitution ie on the day you don't want to turn up you send along your mum?

    excellent point here. Indeed, case law has shown that if a substitution clause exists in the contract, it is usually sufficient to prove that this is not a contract of service (meaning not an employee).
    DISCLAIMER - Whilst I am a qualified and practicing CTA any advice i provide should not be relied upon as i have no possibility of confirming individual circumstances. Any advice i provide is merely a guide and provided in my free time.
  • pjclar02
    pjclar02 Posts: 437 Forumite
    CTA wrote: »
    excellent point here. Indeed, case law has shown that if a substitution clause exists in the contract, it is usually sufficient to prove that this is not a contract of service (meaning not an employee).

    My view is that the existence of a substitution clause will no longer be sufficient going forward (on the basis that anyone can write a substitution clause into a contract when they may not even have anyone suitable to send along to do the work).

    Going forward I imagine HMRC will look more at the commercial position in terms of whether a substitute exists, and in reality has this person actually be sent in to do some work. This would be in line with the new tests for IR35, which award points for sending a substitute (rather than having a contract that says a substitute can be sent).
  • CTA_2
    CTA_2 Posts: 120 Forumite
    pjclar02 wrote: »
    My view is that the existence of a substitution clause will no longer be sufficient going forward (on the basis that anyone can write a substitution clause into a contract when they may not even have anyone suitable to send along to do the work).

    Going forward I imagine HMRC will look more at the commercial position in terms of whether a substitute exists, and in reality has this person actually be sent in to do some work. This would be in line with the new tests for IR35, which award points for sending a substitute (rather than having a contract that says a substitute can be sent).

    I imagine HMRC does look at the reality rather than the 'de jure' of a contract. I would like to think that a court would stick to the principles of contract law, but impossible to say. Last time i looked at this area was about 4 years ago.

    I fundamentally only practice in corporate tax now, I find coming on here forces me to maintain some of my other technical knowledge for the other taxes!
    DISCLAIMER - Whilst I am a qualified and practicing CTA any advice i provide should not be relied upon as i have no possibility of confirming individual circumstances. Any advice i provide is merely a guide and provided in my free time.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.