We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Are they right?

2»

Comments

  • Chrissiew
    Chrissiew Posts: 374 Forumite
    100 Posts
    Our employment contracts state that the company reserves the right to seek a second or specialist opinion on medical matters (paid for at firm's expense).

    Their action seems perfectly reasonable to me. If an employer has doubt about an employee's fitness for work, it has a duty to investigate further.


    Yes and that's what they did and the OT had not heard of a fatty liver before even though we told him its quite common and does not affect health in anyway, but he wanted medical reports from the GP clarifying that fact, which is the right thing to do as why should he take our word, we could have just been saying it to get back to work, the point is the employer has asked for more sick notes so they can get my husband off medical suspension pay (£235pw) and back on to SSP (£85) per week, but the GP won't supply one because he is fit for work.
    not all on benefits are scroungers and don't need to be bullied!
  • Simply tell the employer your OH does not need a fit note because he is fit for work. It doesn't matter what the condition is. Your OH has had the test and the symptom is now a diagnosis (this is where I think the employer is getting confused).

    I can understand the employer wanting a second opinion though considering the occupation. You need to put a rocket up the GP's behind so that the medical records are sent over sooner rather than later.
    Save £200 a month : [STRIKE]Oct[/STRIKE] Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr
  • sniggings
    sniggings Posts: 5,281 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    tbh it sounds as if the person he is seeing isn't a Doctor, I doubt any doctor hasn't heard of a fatty liver and even if they hadn't which if very unlikely they would not admit it you a patient :rotfl: bet it's one of those white coat jumped up bleeps he has seen.
  • But a GP does't specialise in occupational health - so a second opinion from a professional is something that an employer may do when there they feel that they need additional information or more likely, their insurance company has insisted following them reporting the incident.

    For instance I've seen fit note for employees who are bed bound after an operation as they've told the GP they can use their laptop in bed! Yes, they may be able to - but will it cause them further ill health? ergonomics were not considered.

    so yes, an employer can keep an employee away from work if they have concerns - either with the agreement of the GP or on normal wages.

    In this case it does seem to be taking a long time - request a 1-2-1 with management and get them to confirm in writing the position.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.