We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Are employers actually better at responding to applications?
Marie88_2
Posts: 28 Forumite
Hi
I always thought it were agencies who were bad at not replying or acknowledging applications, but after I've applied for several jobs through businesses direct, as well as HR departments of organisations, and businesses, I actually think they are worse than agencies. I seem to be getting more rejection notifications from agencies recently, and the only non agency who seem to bother replying are the regional council.
Businesses, university HR departments, NHS, and other small organisations seem the worst, and I haven't had a response back from any of those in about 40-50 applications. Has anyone else found this?
I always wanted to deal with businesses direct, rather than agencies, but I'm really starting to wonder whether there is much advantage in it lol.
I always thought it were agencies who were bad at not replying or acknowledging applications, but after I've applied for several jobs through businesses direct, as well as HR departments of organisations, and businesses, I actually think they are worse than agencies. I seem to be getting more rejection notifications from agencies recently, and the only non agency who seem to bother replying are the regional council.
Businesses, university HR departments, NHS, and other small organisations seem the worst, and I haven't had a response back from any of those in about 40-50 applications. Has anyone else found this?
I always wanted to deal with businesses direct, rather than agencies, but I'm really starting to wonder whether there is much advantage in it lol.
0
Comments
-
if you're sending speculatively, then the chances are they may just bin the letter if the CV isnt remotely suitable.
if they might use you, in the near term, they may let you know.
otherwise, they're not going to spend the cost of a stamp.
unless you include an email.
to a business, a speculative letter is the consumer equivalent of a cold-call. and we know how frustrating they can be.0 -
Almost all the public sector employers around here are telling applicants in advance that if they haven't heard by a certain date, they haven't been successful. A second class stamp is 50p. Say, 200 applicants for a basic role = £90 to tell people who don't get interviews - and 200 is low for basic roles, some posts get 400+ applicants. 10 positions a week advertised (and again, that is pretty low) = £900 per week or some £46k+ a year. Or, in other words, two jobs! Or more, since a lot of these roles are part-time or term time.0
-
I've applied for quite a few jobs with universities in the last 9 months and the majority of them never send a reply - many of them don't even have an automated email set up to say your application has been received.
Edited to add: I noticed the post by MSE for an intern position, https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4041767, and the advert says:
Due to the large number of enquiries received, we will only reply to successful applicants. Apologies in advance.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards