We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Recovery still five years away, Mervyn King warns

The British economy will not get back on track until at least 2017, the Bank of England Governor has warned in his bleakest outlook for the recovery yet.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/9356628/Recovery-still-five-years-away-Mervyn-King-warns.html

I'm not his greatest fan, but I have to agree with him on this!
«134

Comments

  • pqrdef
    pqrdef Posts: 4,552 Forumite
    Ooh goody. We can have more cuts.

    That will put the recovery back another few years, so then we can have even more cuts.

    Tory heaven!
    "It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
  • And of course house prices will hold up for that long:)
  • undetterred
    undetterred Posts: 635 Forumite
    500 Posts
    And of course house prices will hold up for that long:)

    of course,never been a better time to own.
  • Wookster
    Wookster Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    pqrdef wrote: »
    Ooh goody. We can have more cuts.

    That will put the recovery back another few years, so then we can have even more cuts.

    Tory heaven!

    There wouldn't have to be huge cuts if Labour hadn't run up a massive deficit and let the state grow bigger than the tax take.

    The idea that we can continue to spend £5 for every £4 taken in taxes indefinitely is pure fantasy, the results of which can be seen in Greece.
  • vax2002
    vax2002 Posts: 7,187 Forumite
    Wookster wrote: »
    There wouldn't have to be huge cuts if Labour hadn't run up a massive deficit

    The Coalition are borrowing more !

    Working well is it not ?

    you can not go on blaming Labour, when this lot have made it worse.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • vax2002 wrote: »
    The Coalition are borrowing more !

    Working well is it not ?

    you can not go on blaming Labour, when this lot have made it worse.


    I agree partly, but we should never of given that money to the Banks, it should have been put into infrastructure projects and small buisness.
  • angrypirate
    angrypirate Posts: 1,151 Forumite
    vax2002 wrote: »
    The Coalition are borrowing more !

    Working well is it not ?

    you can not go on blaming Labour, when this lot have made it worse.
    The amount extra borrowed per year is reducing (albeit very slowly). But labour disagree with the policies and want to borrow even more. This is FACT. Labour want to borrow more money and not have austerity. This is FACT. Under labour the deficit would be bigger. We would be going more in Greece's direction. Labour were also too scared to take on the public sector pensions and under Labour there wouldnt have been public sector pension reforms. Now explain to me how this government have made it worse? Explain to me why we cant go on blaming labour? My only gripe with the coalition is they havent cut harder or faster.
  • angrypirate
    angrypirate Posts: 1,151 Forumite
    I agree partly, but we should never of given that money to the Banks, it should have been put into infrastructure projects and small buisness.
    The money given to the banks isnt included in the deficit / public debt.
  • pqrdef
    pqrdef Posts: 4,552 Forumite
    Wookster wrote: »
    The idea that we can continue to spend £5 for every £4 taken in taxes indefinitely is pure fantasy, the results of which can be seen in Greece.
    Better collect some more taxes then.

    What are they waiting for?
    "It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
  • vax2002
    vax2002 Posts: 7,187 Forumite
    There will be a deficit if they allow companies soaking up most of the high street sales and services to get away without paying Tax.
    There is only so much the working can pay.
    collect what's due, every last penny or tell them to get out and open the market to those who will pay tax.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.