We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
6 month limit on mortgage after buying - even if I convert to flats?
Big_Zee
Posts: 51 Forumite
Hi,
I am looking at buying a house as a cash buy, which is currently split into 2 flats (2 seperate entrances not internally connected) but all on the same single freehold.
My plan is to do up the flats, and split them into separate leaseholds, then sell one of them and keep the other.
I understand that most (all?) mortgage companies require a property to have been held for a minimum of 6 months until you can re-mortgage, however would this still apply in my case where I am effectively creating 2 new properties? Ideally I would like to be able to get a mortgage on the flat I decide to keep as soon as possible, so don't want to wait 6 months.
Thanks in advance
I am looking at buying a house as a cash buy, which is currently split into 2 flats (2 seperate entrances not internally connected) but all on the same single freehold.
My plan is to do up the flats, and split them into separate leaseholds, then sell one of them and keep the other.
I understand that most (all?) mortgage companies require a property to have been held for a minimum of 6 months until you can re-mortgage, however would this still apply in my case where I am effectively creating 2 new properties? Ideally I would like to be able to get a mortgage on the flat I decide to keep as soon as possible, so don't want to wait 6 months.
Thanks in advance
0
Comments
-
Hi - I do not think you can get round the 6 months ruling and they would have complete visibility of purchase price etc. so will not be keen to lend.
This will be in addition to likely restricted loan to values as they will be occupied for the first time in this status (newly converted)
I am sure there may be some opportunities to mitigate some of these issues, however not had a case like this in the current "criteria" climate and therefore can only really talk generally as would take a fair bit of time to work a solution.
Hopefully someone will be on soon who has had a case like this recently?I am a Mortgage Broker
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Broker, so you need to take my word for it.This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser code of conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
I agree with Dave,
Six month rule will apply, as will newbuild/conversion LTV restrictions on first occupation.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
The 6 month "rule" is not a legal rule, and some lenders can/will be flexible on this.
Speak to a good broker.I am a mortgage adviser.You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
Thanks for all the advice above - on the point "newbuild/conversion LTV restrictions on first occupation" - this seems like another issue - is this seen as a major problem at all? How much of a restriction can this be, as I obviously wouldn't want a potential buyer to have issues as well.
Thanks0 -
To be frank it's impossible to predict how a future buyers lenders valuer and legal department will react. In the end as long as they are perfectly safe in lending and the property has proper and clear title and a proper property managment co in control of maintenance and lease arrangments, it should be ok.
I've dealt with a few of these and whilst not plain sailing we got there in the end with a few changes made to the property / deeds / lease and what not. It's all about the lender being able to gainfuly reposses and re - sell without any issues. As long as you present the property and legals as a lender would wish, your'e good to go.0 -
A newbuild or newly converted flat will see a maximum loan to value as follows;-
Halifax 80% (65% if second home or BTL)
Nationwide 75%
Abbey 75%.
Lenders picked at random, just for examples.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
