We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Inflation falls to 2.8% in May

124»

Comments

  • gagahouse
    gagahouse Posts: 392 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Kennyboy66 wrote: »
    I thought that all the borrowing figures were net of financial interventions - such as QE

    All that interest the the government pays to the BoE held gilts will come in necessary when QE is eventually un-wound and BoE suffers losses.

    IIRC the BOE is idemnified from any losses by the Treasury.
  • MrRee_2
    MrRee_2 Posts: 2,393 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    People get to keep even MORE of their money!

    REJOICE all ..... low interest rates, low inflation, low mortgage costs, low house prices, it doesn't get much better than this folks!!
    Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!
  • DiggerUK
    DiggerUK Posts: 4,992 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The_J wrote: »
    ...... We have a fiat currency, inflation is inevitable..... This doesn't just suggest that QE is likely, it suggests it is necessary.

    Inflation with a fiat currency is only inevitable, if the state prints beyond our means to dig them and their chums out of trouble.

    To say that QE is necessary, begs the question..for who. All that will happen is that inflation will get even more difficult to contain. More importantly, it will get more difficult to keep under any form of control.

    It seems you view inflation and printy printy, as a victimless crime.
    ..._
  • lvader
    lvader Posts: 2,579 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Without QE we would have deflation so the fact that we still have lowish inflation points to QE being quite well balanced. It also helps keep government borrowing costs at record lows.

    commodity prices incl. the shiny stuff continue to drop pointing at inflation going down further. Oil hit a 17 month low today.
  • EchoLocation
    EchoLocation Posts: 901 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Masomnia wrote: »
    This means inflation is on target, doesn't it?

    If you have a target for long enough eventually the price rises will start to ease and it'll get there. Too bad it's been over target for far too long, with the BOE not only doing nothing to address it, but actively pursuing an inflation policy with QE. Still, we'll likely get to 2% at some point and the media will be falling over themselves to tell us that the BOE knows what it's doing as it's hit it's target... conveniently forgetting all that time running at double the target and all those locked in price rises.
  • lvader
    lvader Posts: 2,579 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The BoE has very little control of inflation, this is especially true when the causes are increased taxation and global commodity prices. Higher interest rates can sometimes help, but increasing them while the country is in recession in generally regarded as a very bad idea. Lucky for us we don't have a bunch of morons running the BoE, because it would have been very easy to use the inflation target as an excuse for killing any chances of recovery.
  • EchoLocation
    EchoLocation Posts: 901 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    lvader wrote: »
    The BoE has very little control of inflation, this is especially true when the causes are increased taxation and global commodity prices. Higher interest rates can sometimes help, but increasing them while the country is in recession in generally regarded as a very bad idea. Lucky for us we don't have a bunch of morons running the BoE, because it would have been very easy to use the inflation target as an excuse for killing any chances of recovery.

    Is it not actually their remit to control inflation?

    No we're positively leading the world in recovery aren't we? Ignoring inflation and screwing savers by keeping interest rates at historic lows to look after the banks/property market has not done us any favours at all.
  • lvader
    lvader Posts: 2,579 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Is it not actually their remit to control inflation?

    They are also required to act to support growth and employment.

    Since the reasons for the inflation were mostly out of their control, the second remit takes on further significance.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.