We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
bank refusing refinance to more affordable rate
beaver30
Posts: 2 Newbie
i work for a large uk bank and have an exsiting mortgage with them(taken out in 2008). I currently pay interest only repayments of £530 per month on a standard variable rate of 4.95%. I have approached my branch for a staff mortgage on a repayment basis, which on the babsis of their quote of staff rate of 1.5%, I could be repaying £640 per month on a full repayment basis )this is of course not only beneficial to me as my repayments would be more affordable, but the bank would also benefit from the debt reducing. I have been advised however that given my current mortgage with them was done through a broker, and the product type does not allow them to place a staff indicator on the mortgage, I am not eligible for a staff mortgage. They have also advised that they cannot treat as a refinance, as chances are the Loan to Value (based on current market value)of the property would not sit within their lending criteria. I understand the property would not value as they would wish for. However I am not accepting the reason which appears to be a techncality that they cannot physically add a staff indicator on the particular product I am currently on. Do I have a case to argue with them? Thanks
0
Comments
-
If you do not fit their criteria then no you don't have a case. Be careful how you approach this as they pay your wages. Do not do anything which could jeapordise your employment, specifically be careful of what you post. Never know who is readingI am a Mortgage AdviserYou should note that this site doesn't check my status as a mortgage adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0
-
Did you obtain your current mortgage through a broker?0
-
yes through a broker0
-
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »Then its not staff product.
He knows that, but he can't switch from this product to the staff mortgage.
Does seem a little unreasonable. Can you remortgage elsewhere and then remortgage back to the staff rate?
Without knowing the specifics I can't comment but if they say no there isnt much you can do.The J is a Financial Advisor-This site doesn't check anyone's status and as such any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Always seek professional advice.0 -
Did you work out the benefit in kind implications if you did get the staff rate? Did you factor it into your costings?
Off the top of my head, the HMRC rate for a staff mortgage is 4%, so you're talking about a BIK of 2.5% of your mortgage amount added to your income for tax purposes.
You a basic or higher rate taxpayer?
Assuming you owe £128,500, you would pay another £53.50 a month in tax if a basic rate taxpayer, £107 per month more if taxed at higher rate.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
Sounds like the LTV problem is curtailing any potential changes, not just the staff rate.Can you remortgage elsewhere and then remortgage back to the staff rate?I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
kingstreet wrote: »Sounds like the LTV problem is curtailing any potential changes, not just the staff rate.
Oh yeah, my eyes wandered with the wall of text.
If it is a LTV issue then, my friend, you're screwed. Start savingThe J is a Financial Advisor-This site doesn't check anyone's status and as such any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Always seek professional advice.0 -
-
Thrugelmir wrote: »Still needs to meet current lending criteria. A problem that many who obtained mortgages in the boom years are now finding.
Indeed, it's a good time to be a broker. Loads of people need advice.The J is a Financial Advisor-This site doesn't check anyone's status and as such any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Always seek professional advice.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
