We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Bankruptcy car question please
Comments
-
Interesting debate about the OPs circumstances (quite why Rochdale_Guy cannot create his own thread on his own problem I do not understand - its quite rude really!)
I own a car which I allow a relative to use. I have never sold it to her and she is the registered keeper. The DLVA assured me that just because I was letting her use the car on a full time basis the correct thing to do was to register it at her address, but also said that I was still the owner unless I actually sell it. My friend pays for the running costs and servicing.
I cannot see how the OP have a car they do not own included in bankruptcy proceedings. This would be like repossing a house from the owner because of the debts of the tenant. If your mil owns the car and can prove it then its not the OR's business whether mil has a loan on it. The OP does however need to be clear that they are not paying off a loan, just contributing to the running costs in return for being allowed to use it.
Edit: The key issue is what the purchase paperwork says. If the car was bought in mil's name and the OP's husband handed over the deposit on the day, or bought the car in her name with her money that is the end of it.Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.0 -
Agree with your edit Bob and I think that will be the final call. I think what was also important is that although the mother had taken out a loan for the car, the payments were made by the potential BR and users of the vehicle which to all intents and purposes mean they are buying and paying for the car."Our prime purpose in this life is to help others. And if you can't help them, at least don't hurt them." Dalai Lama0
-
Beneficial and legal ownership are not always the same. When they are split you have a trust. Property held in trust for another party does not form part of your estate.
There is sufficient evidence pointing to the existence of a trust even if the purchase invoice is in the husband’s name. The OP said so, even if she did not fully understand the implication of her posts. I would not give up without a fight.
When the IP and OR both ignored me over my wife’s shares she escalated matters and won0 -
Interesting debate about the OPs circumstances (quite why Rochdale_Guy cannot create his own thread on his own problem I do not understand - its quite rude really!)
Oh, sorry BobQ - I have now started my own thread....
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4021979
.....please can anyone responding to MY questions in this thread please repost them in my own thread?
Thanks.
.
.
.
.
..0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards