We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

To Remortgage or Not to Remortgage - That is the Question

Hi all,

I have a main residence in which I have lodgers (married couple, one of whom is first cousin). I am in the military and away a lot so it works out well all round. I have had the property for almost two years now and am on a life time tracker 2.99% above base.

I was thinking of remortgaging to a fixed rate deal so that I know exactly what my outgoings are going to be over the next few years but I am also thinking of buying another property in 2-3 years time which would become my main property and the current property would become BTL.

Therefore, to avoid fees I am inclined to stay on my current mortgage for the next few years and then work out what to do when it comes to buying a new place. I have 75% LTV but could prob push it to 70% if it helped.

Do I remortgage to another tracker, a fixed rate or wait it out and see whether I am going to buy or not. From quick property valuations on-line my property has roughly held its value at £188,000. I may consider releasing some of the equity in my current property to get my new place (which I will prob also get a lodger in) even though I would prefer not to, believe it works out better to have equity in main residence to offset tax. Thoughts and advice really appreciated, it will be my first foray into the BTL world.

Comments

  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,462 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Are you thinking of a product transfer with the same lender or a remortgage, which is a change of lender for a new deal?

    If the latter, be careful. Not all lenders allow servicemen to let on residential terms. Some would insist on you changing to a less attractive buy to let (BTL) product.

    As to your rate options - you're going to have to decide your priorities. No-one can decide them for you. Do you want lower cost or certainty of payment?
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • jcrpage
    jcrpage Posts: 19 Forumite
    Thanks Kingstreet, I think my biggest dilemma is that if I buy a second property in 2-3 years which will become my main residence I would have to change the mortgage on my current property to BTL. My priorities are cheaper repayments but I'm also wary of product transfer fees. If I did change my mortgage it would be to another lender as I don't think I could get a better deal with my current lender.
  • HappyMJ
    HappyMJ Posts: 21,115 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    jcrpage wrote: »
    Thanks Kingstreet, I think my biggest dilemma is that if I buy a second property in 2-3 years which will become my main residence I would have to change the mortgage on my current property to BTL. My priorities are cheaper repayments but I'm also wary of product transfer fees. If I did change my mortgage it would be to another lender as I don't think I could get a better deal with my current lender.
    You do not always have to change a residential owner occupier mortgage to a buy to let mortgage you can get consent to let. That permission will usually be given if you have enough equity.
    :footie:
    :p Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S) :p Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money. :p
  • HappyMJ wrote: »
    You do not always have to change a residential owner occupier mortgage to a buy to let mortgage you can get consent to let. That permission will usually be given if you have enough equity.

    This would unlikely be a long term option. It tends to only be for a short period and is at the discretion of the lender (as are the renewals when they come around).

    It should not be viewed as a long term alternative to a B2L product since no lender will grant it indefinitely but could certainly be the cheapest option for the first year or two if the lender permits.
    Thinking critically since 1996....
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.