We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Removed from Deeds but remain in property ?
Options

steviep1977
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hi,
a friend of mine lives with her mum, they are both currently on the mortgage.
She wants to remortgage and remove mum (transfer of equity) so that she can extend the term (resticted due to mums age).
Mum will still live there. There will be no money changing hands just simply removing her from mortgage/deeds.
can you see the lender having an issue with this ?
Thanks
Steve
a friend of mine lives with her mum, they are both currently on the mortgage.
She wants to remortgage and remove mum (transfer of equity) so that she can extend the term (resticted due to mums age).
Mum will still live there. There will be no money changing hands just simply removing her from mortgage/deeds.
can you see the lender having an issue with this ?
Thanks
Steve
0
Comments
-
Probably, and the sums would have to be done as there will be cost in undertaking this. Removing one party effectively raises the risk of the mortgage, and extending the term would suggest they are struggling anyway, more details on the exact situation might help.0
-
..... and BIG WARNING .... there are a number of other potential issues here, primarily deprivation.
Both parties must take professional guidance independently, with full disclosure, on the proposed transaction.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
Hi thanks for that.
Incase you're interested, Nationwide said if mum is coming off the mortgage see can't live at the property.
Something to do with gifting her share of the equity causes problems if daughter was to be reposessed they would struggle to get mum out of the property as she has rights.0 -
Absolutely correct - and although in principle this could be documented, provided the correct processes were followed, to overcome that problem it is totally understandable that the lender doesn't want to go that route.
It is possibly doable with a good adviser - but a good adviser will also want to ensure that the mother is protected correctly.
The potential for disaster (in years to come if not immediately) in this sort of case is considerable.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
Pretty sure this is impossible because of the aforementioned overriding rights to the property.
This hasn't been tested in law I don't think but they are being careful.The J is a Financial Advisor-This site doesn't check anyone's status and as such any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Always seek professional advice.0 -
Mum should also be advised to get independent legal advice. By this proposed course of action, she would have no right of recourse if OP decided to turf her out - no legal right to live in the home.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards