We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Consent to Let or Let without Consent???

2»

Comments

  • fimonkey
    fimonkey Posts: 1,238 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Out of interest does the same apply for lodgers if the mortgagee still lives there but lets out other rooms. Do you need permission then from mortgage company?
  • The_J
    The_J Posts: 1,250 Forumite
    Not usually fimonkey.
    The J is a Financial Advisor-This site doesn't check anyone's status and as such any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Always seek professional advice.
  • holly_hobby
    holly_hobby Posts: 5,363 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 16 May 2012 at 12:43PM
    No, as the mortgagor is on site so to speak and it remains their primary residence - it is perceived that they will ensure the property isn't trashed by the lodger/tenant, to an extent causing serious finanical issue and suriety issues for the lender.

    With regards renting the whole property, and the increase in rates (due to income being derived) - once its let for commerical return i.e rent - it becomes a semi commerical dwelling of the owner and increased risk of default and suriety of the lender - and therefore can not remain on residential loan rates due to the increased risk factors.

    This is because the lender will consider that the owner (having a separate primary residence), in times of financial trouble. may well elect to maintain the mge on their own home (for obv reasons), rather than that on a property they no longer reside in which is rented - hence the added risk and higher rates (along side the tenant issue of course).

    Hope this helps

    Holly
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    With regards renting the whole property, and the increase in rates (due to income being derived) - once its let for commerical return i.e rent - it becomes a semi commerical dwelling of the owner and increased risk of default and suriety of the lender - and therefore can not remain on residential loan rates due to the increased risk factors.

    This is because the lender will consider that the owner (having a separate primary residence), in times of financial trouble. may well elect to maintain the mge on their own home (for obv reasons), rather than that on a property they no longer reside in which is rented - hence the added risk and higher rates (along side the tenant issue of course).

    Also far greater possibility that the property will not be maintained to such a high standard or quality as an owner occupied property. Thereby reducing its resale value as well.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.