We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
County Court Help (Part monies owed)
knet2020
Posts: 1 Newbie
Hi,
I am looking for some advice regarding my situation as it seems a little odd:
I was served claim a few days ago relating to a historic debt. This was originally with HSBC and related to a bank account/overdraft facility. It was 'sold' to a company (registered in St Helier) in Dec 2011 the amount of the debt is approx £1800.
The claim is for 'part monies owed' in the amount of £299.99 with fees and solicitors costs added making £364.
It seems a little strange (to me) why the company would request that amount as it only represents a 1/4 of the total.
I suspected this was related to 'court fees' and limits as it's 1p under the 1st threshold for charges. However it seems more than a little unfair/underhand as 1) it seems they will be able to claim 4 times (with the obvious implications for fees) and judgment(s)
I am in the process of writing to the creditor to obtain a copy of the agreement and disputing the claim with the court (on the basis this is NOT the amount owed)
Can I ask why this approach would have been taken?
I am looking for some advice regarding my situation as it seems a little odd:
I was served claim a few days ago relating to a historic debt. This was originally with HSBC and related to a bank account/overdraft facility. It was 'sold' to a company (registered in St Helier) in Dec 2011 the amount of the debt is approx £1800.
The claim is for 'part monies owed' in the amount of £299.99 with fees and solicitors costs added making £364.
It seems a little strange (to me) why the company would request that amount as it only represents a 1/4 of the total.
I suspected this was related to 'court fees' and limits as it's 1p under the 1st threshold for charges. However it seems more than a little unfair/underhand as 1) it seems they will be able to claim 4 times (with the obvious implications for fees) and judgment(s)
I am in the process of writing to the creditor to obtain a copy of the agreement and disputing the claim with the court (on the basis this is NOT the amount owed)
Can I ask why this approach would have been taken?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards