We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Fixed Rate Mortgage Tie In - Requesting Advice!!

Hi all,

I would really appreciate peoples opinions on the following;

Myself and partner purchased our house pretty close to the peak of the market in 2006, tied into an interest only mortgage for 3 years at 5.69%.

Ideally we planned to move on after we got married in 2009 and the market plummeted therefore our house is in negative equity and is probably worth 1/2 of what we paid for it.
We have started a family and our house is unsuitable but we have no choice but to stay here.

We have sat on the base rate (standard variable rate) again paying interest only after our 3 year deal lapsed overpaying when possible. Now as the rates are beginning to rise we have few options but to stay with our current lender and tie into a full repayment mortgage;

Option 1 - 3 years at 4.55%

Option 2 - 5 years at 4.99%

Any advice is appreciated - thanks

Comments

  • Joe_Bloggs
    Joe_Bloggs Posts: 4,535 Forumite
    What is the term of the mortgage ? If it is for 25 years plus then the repayments strategy is easier to handle than just 20 years or less . There is more interest to pay by delaying repayment of capital borrowed over time.

    I can't believe that your house price is 50% of what it was in 2006. I am not saying it isn't true either.

    J_B.
  • Lokolo
    Lokolo Posts: 20,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    What LTV are you looking at? They are quite high.
  • dimbo61
    dimbo61 Posts: 13,727 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The OP is in Negative equity as he states in his post.
    I have recently finished a 5 year fix at 4.74% and we put down over 50% deposit so I would go for the 5 year deal and be in it for the long term.
    you cant afford to move and have no equity so take the long term view and with luck you will have 75% LTV in 5 years time.
    Only my views
  • property.advert
    property.advert Posts: 4,087 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    5 years at 4.99% is still well under the historic average. It is a better bet than 3 years at 4.55% as the likelihood of prices doubling in 3 years to get the OP out of negative equity is near zero and rates are possibly going to be higher then than now.
  • Joe_Bloggs
    Joe_Bloggs Posts: 4,535 Forumite
    These are the change in house price values from Nationwide
    For Q1 2006 to Q1 2012 for a property of 100K in 2006 . I have only shown those that have fell in value. These are only averages etc. and their could be depressing local circumstances

    Greater London -16.23%
    Outer Metropolitan -8.78%
    Outer South East -4.27%
    Scotland -9.52%
    Southwest -0.72%

    If the OP is going to move before the 5 years then there could be large early repayment charges to pay. There is also the question of follow on rate.
    J_B.
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 456.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 248.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 179K Life & Family
  • 263.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.