We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

JP Moron - How to lose 2 billion bucks on a single trade

24

Comments

  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    I've heard that it was Bruno Iksil who was driving the SUV with blacked out windows :eek:
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    For anyone interested in the actual dynamics underpinning this whole sequence of events, worth looking at this blog, and the websites it links to.

    http://dealbreaker.com/2012/05/the-tale-of-a-whale-of-a-fail/
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    Generali wrote: »
    It's also worth noting that you can't just sell to nobody: if JP Morgan want to hold this short they need to have people that want the same total sized long position.

    I tried explaining that last year, but it appears they can't get their heads around the concept.

    It would have been easy money if you could buy and sell stuff without a counterparty....

    Mine @ 50
    Yours @ 75

    .......money for old rope.

    I knew I was going badly wrong somewhere :eek:
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Most interesting fact I've seen is JPM have single handedly saved the UK mortgage market. As they've bought around 90% of securitised mortgage debt issued since 2008.

    Seems they've the funds after pulling billions of $ from Europe.
  • The_J
    The_J Posts: 1,250 Forumite
    Saved? Saved? Are JPM a charity or something?

    UK debt is extremely attractive, house prices hold their value better here, defaults/repossessions are relatively rare but when they happen they are pretty straightforward with little media interference.

    That's why Santander/Nationwide(cf Silverstone)/Lloyds etc. have used securitisation to recapitalise ever since the house prices levelled out. In the case of Nationwide specifically it gives them more capital to poach a greater market share.
    The J is a Financial Advisor-This site doesn't check anyone's status and as such any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Always seek professional advice.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The_J wrote: »
    Saved? Saved? Are JPM a charity or something?

    UK debt is extremely attractive,

    90% to a single buyer?

    Not globally attractive. The BOE has concerns over the wholesale money markets. Bearing this fact in mind understandably so. As more debt comes up for refinancing.
  • sabretoothtigger
    sabretoothtigger Posts: 10,036 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    Sounds like they were hedging the entire worth of the firm. I count JPM as canny operators usually
    I think they also have hundreds of billions in cash so we're unlikely to see anything dramatic happen but with skeletons like this maybe they are not as healthy as they appeared

    Hence the stock is a value trap, yields 3.3% :cool:


    All these banks regularly take big risks, some might say this is their job to venture where many dare not. GS just loaned 3bn to a firm with negative cashflow of 12bn this year

    Also JPM absorbed Bear Sterns didnt they? So maybe they picked up some bad habits. That was back when HBOS got shorted -20% in one day all the way down to 400p :phttp://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/mar/20/hbosbusiness.businessqandas
    Extreme risks are normal now, quit fretting :beer:

    8Ztrx.png

    Shorting JPM
  • worldtraveller
    worldtraveller Posts: 14,013 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 28 June 2012 at 9:35AM
    How to lose 2 billion bucks on a single trade........

    ........The New York Times reckon it could reach $9 billion!

    Hey! What's the odd few billion bucks nowadays anyway? :rotfl:
    There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, There is society, where none intrudes, By the deep sea, and music in its roar: I love not man the less, but Nature more...
  • Some are saying it could be a lot more.

    Why the big change now? It used to be the JPMorgan had a free ticked to do whatever they wanted. They took a load of account holders money from MFGlobal just before they went bankrupt and were allowed to keep it. Leaving account holders thinking never to hold funds anywhere where there is counterparty risk ever again.

    Now why are JPMorgan no longer under the do whatever they want and get away with it umbrella?
  • sabretoothtigger
    sabretoothtigger Posts: 10,036 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    edited 28 June 2012 at 12:23PM
    Ever watched RussiaToday on tv they said for years JPM was going broke, not from this but for short selling silver

    I always watch them for the devils advocate point of view.
    They took a load of account holders money from MFGlobal just before they went bankrupt and were allowed to keep it
    Sounds normal, the biggest creditors get paid first. Taxman then biggest dealers with MF global then the scraps maybe get left to fight over by the little guys.

    Most brokers here are covered for their money like savings I think. Robbie Burns had 100k or so with MF but withdrew some on the day, he was left waiting for the rest.

    I myself am owed money from a bankrupt broker. The CEO left and they found out the company had spent client funds. The liquidator hasnt said what percent can be recovered


    http://www.kpmg.com/UK/en/IssuesAndInsights/worldspreads-special-administration/Pages/Outcome-ofinitial-creditors-and-clients-meeting.aspx

    http://www.kpmg.com/UK/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Pages/mfglobaluk.aspx
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.