We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
HL Sipp platform
Credit-Crunched
Posts: 2,212 Forumite
Hey all,
Looking at transferring my company pension (being made redundant and would like more flexibly with investment options)
Any one got any experience with HL SIPP's seem pretty reasonable on fees etc, what is their gui like when you have an account?
Will be just to transfer a lump sum in as new company DCS will be receiving my monthly payments.
Cheers
Looking at transferring my company pension (being made redundant and would like more flexibly with investment options)
Any one got any experience with HL SIPP's seem pretty reasonable on fees etc, what is their gui like when you have an account?
Will be just to transfer a lump sum in as new company DCS will be receiving my monthly payments.
Cheers
0
Comments
-
HL's platform is about the most well-featured and user-friendly there is, and their customer service is excellent.
However, you need to take care with fees.
1) They don't refund any trail commission on funds in a SIPP. For holding funds, there are better platforms such as BestInvest and Fidelity.
2) HL charge 0.5% pa (capped at £200) for holding equities and ETFs in a SIPP.
3) They also have £2 per trackers pcm fees for most trackers. This makes them an expensive place to hold multiple trackers but a *great* place to hold a single Vanguard Lifestrategy tracker.
The big caveat to all of this is that new rules will change the fee structure of all platforms over the next 12 months,
My wife has a new SIPP starting with HL and is going to use a single Vaguard LS tracker. We're going to use LS 100% equity with our own property and fixed interest alongside, but LS 80% is a great option for "buy and forget".I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0 -
What kind of pension is your old pension?0
-
-
Credit-Crunched wrote: »put them into more adventurous funds than the provider (towers watson)
I hope you DYOR regards risk/reward, asset allocation, etc.
It's really easy to get this stuff wrong.I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0 -
gadgetmind wrote: »I hope you DYOR regards risk/reward, asset allocation, etc.
It's really easy to get this stuff wrong.
I will do
i am looking at
Aberdeen emerging markets
jpm natural resources
invesco latin american0 -
Credit-Crunched wrote: »I will do
i am looking at
Aberdeen emerging markets
jpm natural resources
invesco latin american
Couple of questions: Do you have significant other pension investments? Are you a long way from drawing your pension?
Unless you can say yes to both questions I think you could benefit from better diversification. The funds you mention are pretty volatile and do have significant commonality. Miners and drillers can be among the largest companies in emerging countries and so with your Natural Resources fund you could be over exposed to those sectors. Also from the fund's details on Trustnet, Aberdeen EM invests more in Brazil than in any other country.
If you just want to invest in major funds you may find cheaper options than a SIPP - many simple personal pensions offer a good range of investments.0 -
Couple of questions: Do you have significant other pension investments? Are you a long way from drawing your pension?
Unless you can say yes to both questions I think you could benefit from better diversification. The funds you mention are pretty volatile and do have significant commonality. Miners and drillers can be among the largest companies in emerging countries and so with your Natural Resources fund you could be over exposed to those sectors. Also from the fund's details on Trustnet, Aberdeen EM invests more in Brazil than in any other country.
If you just want to invest in major funds you may find cheaper options than a SIPP - many simple personal pensions offer a good range of investments.
Hi thanks for your views, I have savings in numerous cash based ISA wrappers.
I also have a pension with my new employer paying around £10k NET per year into it, I am 31 so a long way off.
I also pay into a Halifax share builder to ensure I top up my ISA for the year again in varying shares, vodafone, bp, and some aim shares if they are dual listed.
What funds would you look at recommending to diversify a little and remove the developing and mining over exposure?
Cheers0 -
I suggest you maybe visit the HYP boards on Motley Fool for the high yield share side of things. Perhaps also buy a copy of Smarter Investing by Tim Hale to understand how to construct a reasonably robust portfolio of diverse assets.I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0 -
When compared to Invesco Perpetual High Income the first HYPe portfolio substantially under-performed the managed fund. HYPe is a nice concept but the results for at least the first don't support it being a good idea compared to the other choices out there. That's a shame because it is an attractive concept.
HYPe is one of the concepts that Motley Fool brought over from its US site, where there is a higher capital gains tax on holding things for less than a year and where fund holders are taxed each year on the capital gains of he shares sold by the funds they hold. The result of those two things is a significant incentive for US investors to use a buy and hold approach. The UK doesn't have a higher CGT for holdings up to a year and doesn't tax you on trades within a fund, just on the gain when you sell the fund itself.0 -
It underperformed "a" managed fund, one that has performed far better than its peers in the past. Could this have been predicted at the time?HYPe is a nice concept but the results for at least the first don't support it being a good idea compared to the other choices out there. That's a shame because it is an attractive concept.
Lots of HYPers have done very well with their own portfolios and similarly many other high-income managed funds suffered from heavy capital losses.I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards