We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a very Happy New Year. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Employers can't 'afford' to pay a living wage?
Comments
-
Its the big huge companies out there that annoy me. They make millions and millions every year but only pay their staff minimum wage. I can understand small businesses paying minimum wage, but i have no sympathy with the 'big boys'0
-
Its the big huge companies out there that annoy me. They make millions and millions every year but only pay their staff minimum wage. I can understand small businesses paying minimum wage, but i have no sympathy with the 'big boys'
But if the 'big boys' pay above market rate for a minimum wage job it would have an adverse effect on the small businesses whose staffing costs would also go up...and the whole inflationary thing continues.
And chances are, a part of those millions and millions from the big huge companies ends up in your pension pot (if you have one).0 -
I think the big elephant in the room we are all forgetting is that the jobs are not there.
Yes, the most optimistic calculation I've seen is four jobseekers to a vacancy. In my area it's 7. The possible solutions are a massive population reduction (unlikely, but we could get a new flu pandemic), creating more jobs (not going to happen on a big enough scale) or abandoning the ideal of every one being fully employed in a 40 hour a week job. However, getting rid of the 40 hour culture means that part-time jobs must pay enough to handle rent & living costs. Part time jobs don't do this if they are minimum wage.
The really big elephant is that the non-minimum wage jobs are not there. Everyone I know on minimum wage has a degree.
Everyone I know on minimum wage has at least five years experience.
Everyone I know on mimimum wage is making as many job applications as possible outside of their current work.
Of course, the plural of ancedote is not data.:D However, if these people are having trouble moving on from non-minimum wage work, what about those with no qualifications or experience?
Then there's the jobs that pay minimum wage, but should be valued higher. Shop keyholders for instance. Maybe I'm overly cautious, but I don't think the lowest paid employees should be the ones opening & closing the store and the safe.0 -
In a heartbeat pal! But then I'm not greedy.Itismehonest wrote: »I'd be really interested to know how many people on here would, if they won millions on a lottery, would give it all or even say 50% of it to the poor?
I would be more than happy having enough to live on without having the need to work or rely on benefits but that is all. No holidays, fancy restaurants, private schools etc.
If I had only won 500K though, that would be another matter.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 260K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards