We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

VAT. Is it entirely pointless for a service company?

1235»

Comments

  • Kennyboy66
    Kennyboy66 Posts: 939 Forumite
    A._Badger wrote: »
    Yes, it's possible to deregister but the point about needless complexity holds good. Even if people can deregister now, they couldn't when they were sucked-in.

    Defenders of VAT, in my experience, tend either to be accountants or people who work in finance departments. I've never met a sole trader who didn't consider it just another way for government to waste his time.

    By its very nature it is bound to be wasting time as you are collecting the governments tax for them.

    However I have yet to meet a sole trader or small business owners whos accounting records are in a worse state because they have to keep records for VAT.

    In fact, it is a really useful discipline and can do done on a spreadsheet, analysis book, cheapo accounting package or just using A4 paper.

    It is far easier than having to administer PAYE / NI and in most cases easier than calculating corporation tax or schedular taxes.

    Of course before 1973, the UK had Purchase Tax, and in an environment which was much less focused around service industries and small businesses this was ludicrously complicated.

    As one example, the Lotus 7 was provided in kit form to avoid purchase tax. However assembly instructions were forbidden using this tax loophole, so they provided disassembly instruction, which the user had to follow in reverse.
    US housing: it's not a bubble - Moneyweek Dec 12, 2005
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.