We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MP's want compensation for pensioners suffering low interest rates

12346»

Comments

  • princeofpounds
    princeofpounds Posts: 10,396 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Here's an idea. Why don't they sell the houses they paid a few grand for, and are now worth several hundred thousand pounds. The notion of young workers paying more in tax to allow the luckiest generation in history to live easier is preposterous. I'm sure pensioner's votes has nothing to do with this idea.

    This.... although the luckiest generation is only just starting to enter pension age.

    Record low interest rates might reduce the income on an investment pot, but they have also massively increased the value of many of those investment pots (especially those who invested in property, shares or anything else that delivers a real income).
  • Itismehonest
    Itismehonest Posts: 4,352 Forumite
    DaddyBear wrote: »
    Here's an idea. Why don't they sell the houses they paid a few grand for, and are now worth several hundred thousand pounds. The notion of young workers paying more in tax to allow the luckiest generation in history to live easier is preposterous. I'm sure pensioner's votes has nothing to do with this idea.

    There are many that would love to but the concentration on making things easier for the bottom end of the market hasn't helped at all with anything further up.
    Even if they sell their property a home of some sort still has to be paid for. That's either another purchase, rental or, in some cases, tens of thousands needed every year to pay for care in a home.
    As to the luckiest generation - you really need to speak to more people who were born before the 60s.
  • Radiantsoul
    Radiantsoul Posts: 2,096 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    CLAPTON wrote: »
    the principles of pension are sadly not understood (a bit like the paradox of thrift/savings)

    savings for retirement can benefit an individual or a few in society as that means thst some of us can be richer than the others

    if everyone saves for retirement then we might just as well have a an increased state pension

    I guess the issue is who bears the investment risk. If you let people have their own accounts they do.

    The other thing is you would probably have to run a government surplus.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.