We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Houses round my way are selling for high prices and like hot cakes
Comments
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »300!?!??!?
Im not really bothered where i live, ive got a few towns in mind.0 -
NextLegUpIsTheBig0ne wrote: »Ignore him. Its the school holidays and he has no one to play with.
I did have a ball i could play with but somebody nicked it the other day.
Have you got a ball ?0 -
It's naive to think house price rises result from doing nothing.
It takes intelligent use of Magnolia paint and selective knocking down of walls too. I know coz Krusty & Phwyll told me so.0 -
Locally 17 properties within quarter mile on rightmove of which 11 are sold.
We looked at a property at the weekend but decided not to proceed as they already had half a dozen offers above asking price.
All anecdotal but there are some areas where the housing market is not dead. These are generally not ftb properties so may be the lack of equity/deposit is not a problem for this sector of the market.I think....0 -
ruggedtoast wrote: »I take no pleasure from anothers distress, they got the price they needed, and I got the price I wanted to pay.
They were distressed and f e c k l e s s boomers though, this is merely an accurate description.
Were they, as there seems to be some confusion as to what boomers are?0 -
-
ruggedtoast wrote: »They were like this. definitely boomers:
I wold say quite a few of them look older than boomers0 -
-
Actually more like these:
0 -
Obviously they didn't look as happy as that.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards