We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Lame ducks

macaque_2
macaque_2 Posts: 2,439 Forumite
Is this a coded reference to buy-to-let? After all, low interest rates hardly benefit normal small businesses who struggle to get any credit at all in the current climate.
HISTORICALLY low interest rates have delayed the rebalancing of the economy by keeping troubled firms afloat
This is certainly valid for BTLs who have high levels of debt and narrow margins. Some are not even staying solvent with base rates at 0.5%.
.......Bank official, Spencer Dale said Threadneedle Street’s stance could have “slowed the reallocation of capital and labour to more productive uses”.
Yup, they must be talking about BTL

http://www.cityam.com/latest-news/bank-low-rates-keep-dud-firms-life-support

Comments

  • No, it's not a coded reference to BTL. If the article was about BTL, then the words "buy to let" would appear somewhere in the article, but hey, keep up the conspiracy theory work.

    As devastating as it may be to you, the MPC tend to talk about controlling inflation at their monthly meetings. The fact that you personally cannot afford a house is, bizarrely, not their priority.

    In the future, house prices will rise or fall, inflation will increase or decrease, BTL will increase or decrease, interest rates will change. And none of it, absolutely none of it, will be affected by your individual circumstances.

    You obviously feel that life isn't fair and you are correct in that assumption.
    Nothing is foolproof, as fools are so ingenious! :D
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    No, it's not a coded reference to BTL. If the article was about BTL, then the words "buy to let" would appear somewhere in the article, but hey, keep up the conspiracy theory work.

    Maybe it's bad luck to mention BTL in publications so journalists now say "troubled firms" as a proxy.

    A bit like actors say the "Scottish play" instead of Macbeth.
  • wotsthat wrote: »
    Maybe it's bad luck to mention BTL in publications so journalists now say "troubled firms" as a proxy.

    A bit like actors say the "Scottish play" instead of Macbeth.

    I see what you mean. Up till now, I have been completely unable to afford to buy a £2,000,000 pied-à-terre in Kensington.

    Henceforth, I have decided that it is no longer "unable to afford". I will now refer to it as "priced out of the market":)
    Nothing is foolproof, as fools are so ingenious! :D
  • macaque_2
    macaque_2 Posts: 2,439 Forumite
    Thank you for this tartanterra. My comments below
    No, it's not a coded reference to BTL. If the article was about BTL, then the words "buy to let" would appear somewhere in the article, but hey, keep up the
    conspiracy theory work.
    The subject relates to cheap credit going to unproductive businesses. What else can they be talking about other than BTL?
    It also doesn't take a genius to work out why they don't spell it out. It is alrealy looking like some banks will need refinancing and BTL's are currently the most effective way of derisking their toxic property debt.
    As devastating as it may be to you, the MPC tend to talk about controlling inflation at their monthly meetings.
    Err wrong! The MPC's remit is 2% inflation which they could achieve by increasing interest rates. Interest rates have been at 1/2% for years despite a sustained and chronic overshoot on inflation.
    The fact that you personally cannot afford a house is, bizarrely, not their priority
    Since it is none of your business I will leave you guessing as to whether you are right or wrong on this one.
    In the future, house prices will rise or fall, inflation will increase or decrease, BTL will increase or decrease, interest rates will change. And none of it, absolutely none of it, will be affected by your individual circumstances.
    You obviously feel that life isn't fair and you are correct in that assumption.
    There is nothing really to answer here. You are just venting spleen
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.