Daily Mail Rewards Club Thread

some_time_soon

joedenly
Earlier on today you appeared to offer a code,
I pmed and said I would like the code if you were in fact offering a code.
I have received no reply, by pm or on the board
It then appeared you gave the code to ianforcer
You have since offered a code you found at the gym
Offer the code from the gym to a long standing member of the forum and we will see what happens


Are you able and willing to do this?

some_time_soon

joedenly wrote: »

another spare code for today, went to gym and found a paper there

PM me, am looking for a wednesday, thursday and friday code
thank you

Posted 13 minutes after ianforcer said you had sent them a code and you use the words another spare code ?

Tweets_2

At the rate you're registering new id's, it's not really difficult to open a couple of browsers and PM yourself. You admitted in a PM to me today that you 'knew' Rogers123.

Tweets_2

I'm bored now so I'll leave you and your new buddy to talk to yourself.

auchterarder

joedenly wrote: »

see you cannot prove it can you, you just lied

Tweets is without doubt one of the most helpful people I have come across on this site and I object to you calling her a liar.
Please stop this nonsense and move on.

soco1

Spare Sunday code
06 08 42 44 59 62

auchterarder

soco1 wrote: »

Spare Sunday code
06 08 42 44 59 62

Attempted this code 10 seconds after you posted it and it had been used

quoia

ianforcer wrote: »

Hi everyone,

I noticed that new user 'joedenly' had had some posts removed earlier this afternoon under spam suspicion. I can now vouch for them that they are a genuine user as I have just traded codes and the one they sent was legit for today. I then sent them mine after inputted theirs so as not to risk getting burnt.

Please embrace this newbie and know that he is not our returning 'friend' and has submitted a valid code.

Thanks for your understanding.

Time for MY TWO-PENNETH

Sorry to cast doubt on your post vouching for the authenticity of this user 'joedenly' but I would suggest all is not as clear as it might appear.

He PMed me out of the blue WELL OVER 4 hours ago asking for any codes from last week offering me one of today's in exchange.
I quickly checked his posts etc. and found that he had only joined today and one of his posts (now deleted) made just a few moments before his PM was offering a £5 Amazon "Gift Certificate Code" to the 1st person (absolutely free without strings attached) to the 1st person to PM him, stating he was giving it away since he didn't have an Amazon account

I replied to his PM to me offering Wed, Thurs & Fri codes and that I'd like the Amazon £5 voucher instead of a spare code for today since I already had mine and DO have an Amazon account.

I got a reply saying that IF I sent him the codes for Wed, Thurs, Fri AND TODAY he would send me the Amazon gift code.

I pointed out his meager 3 posts on Day 1 against my 10,000+ in 9 years of membership and that I'd like the Amazon one FIRST.
I also queried WHY he would like me to send him a code for TODAY when his original PM to me was OFFERING a code for TODAY.

I didn't get a PM reply but there was a response on another thread :huh: (again deleted) again asking for me to PM the codes ahead of him sending me the Amazon one saying something about being uncomfortable just giving away a £5 voucher first - Odd that his original post for this Amazon code WAS EXACTLY THAT :rotfl:

He then posted on this thread that he could give me a FREE 30-day Love Film membership instead, that came with a £15 Amazon "Gift Certificate Code", if I PMed him the codes

I posted back that I didn't need a 30-day Love Film trial.

He went away after that :rotfl:

I wouldn't trust him an inch.

DODGY
DODGY
DODGY
DODGY
DODGY
DODGY
DODGY

Decide for yourselves

quoia

joedenly wrote: »

Guys we are a community here, we should all get on and give codes to each other. I have proved i should be accepted in this community by giving legit codes so please allow me to swap and receive codes from you guys

WE might be a community ....

... however right at this minute you're a nobody ...

and DEFINITELY NOT PART OF IT !

POPPYOSCAR

quoia wrote: »

Time for MY TWO-PENNETH

Sorry to cast doubt on your post vouching for the authenticity of this user 'joedenly' but I would suggest all is not as clear as it might appear.

He PMed me out of the blue WELL OVER 4 hours ago asking for any codes from last week offering me one of today's in exchange.
I quickly checked his posts etc. and found that he had only joined today and one of his posts (now deleted) made just a few moments before his PM was offering a £5 Amazon "Gift Certificate Code" to the 1st person (absolutely free without strings attached) to the 1st person to PM him, stating he was giving it away since he didn't have an Amazon account

I replied to his PM to me offering Wed, Thurs & Fri codes and that I'd like the Amazon £5 voucher instead of a spare code for today since I already had mine and DO have an Amazon account.

I got a reply saying that IF I sent him the codes for Wed, Thurs, Fri AND TODAY he would send me the Amazon gift code.

I pointed out his meager 3 posts on Day 1 against my 10,000+ in 9 years of membership and that I'd like the Amazon one FIRST.
I also queried WHY he would like me to send him a code for TODAY when his original PM to me was OFFERING a code for TODAY.

I didn't get a PM reply but there was a response on another thread :huh: (again deleted) again asking for me to PM the codes ahead of him sending me the Amazon one saying something about being uncomfortable just giving away a £5 voucher first - Odd that his original post for this Amazon code WAS EXACTLY THAT :rotfl:

He then posted on this thread that he could give me a FREE 30-day Love Film membership instead, that came with a £15 Amazon "Gift Certificate Code", if I PMed him the codes

I posted back that I didn't need a 30-day Love Film trial.

He went away after that :rotfl:

I wouldn't trust him an inch.

DODGY
DODGY
DODGY
DODGY
DODGY
DODGY
DODGY

Decide for yourselves

I think most of us know what is going on in this thread.