We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Santander just cleaned us. HELP
Comments
-
Where i work, we aren't allowed to use benefits to pay against an overdraft, we have to allow the customer access to whatever benefits they get. Would imagine most banks take the same stance.0
-
Well, at least in the past Halifax certainly did not!! because of disability and death of my daughter, I was receiving benefits including Child Benefit and I took Halifax to Court, and won over charges. They instantaneously withdrew my overdraft facility and kept all of my benefits for 2 whole weeks!! I was reduced to going in branch and begging on my knees to the manageress, who told me to get up, stop making a fool of myself and get out - all I wanted was £10 from my benefits because I am diabetic!!.
Benefit offices require at least 7 days notice to make changes to their payment section.0 -
Snowedunder wrote: »Well, at least in the past Halifax certainly did not!! because of disability and death of my daughter, I was receiving benefits including Child Benefit and I took Halifax to Court, and won over charges. They instantaneously withdrew my overdraft facility and kept all of my benefits for 2 whole weeks!! I was reduced to going in branch and begging on my knees to the manageress, who told me to get up, stop making a fool of myself and get out - all I wanted was £10 from my benefits because I am diabetic!!.
Benefit offices require at least 7 days notice to make changes to their payment section.
That is truly shocking. Scum of the earth.0 -
Yes, you can request right of appropriation, but the OP didn't. The fact remains that unless you have instructed them otherwise by making the right of first appropriation, the bank has the second right and will make payments in whichever order they wish ie benefits are not earmarked specially unless you make it so.
Since that right had not been exercised, the bank was acting entirely correctly in assigned the monies to their overdraft. The fact that some may have got it back is down to their goodwill. If you had told them previously that you wished to allocate the money that would have been different but you didn't do that did you?
It will also be incumbent upon the claimant to appropriate all funds moving through the account, else the right will lapse.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards