We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Were single mothers better off in the 19th Century?
samtoby
Posts: 2,438 Forumite
Read this link....interesting....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17159966
Average weekly incomes today
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17159966
Average weekly incomes today
- Single/couple all in full-time work £644:eek:
- Couple, one full-time, one part-time work £567
- Couple, one full-time work, one not working £519
- No full-time, one or more part-time work £419
- Workless, one or more aged 60 or over £381
- Workless, one or more unemployed £246
- Workless, other inactive £298
3 Children - 2004 :heart2: 2014 :heart2: 2017 :heart2:
Happily Married since 2016
Happily Married since 2016
0
Comments
-
What a !!!!!! article.0
-
When i started to do a family tree i found out that my Grandad was born in a workhouse in 1894, i came to a dead end trying to trace any information but from what i could make out his Mum must have been kicked out on the street by her parents when she got pregnant. I doubt that would happen today.Liverpool is one of the wonders of Britain,
What it may grow to in time, I know not what.
Daniel Defoe: 1725.
0 -
How could you even pose such a stupid question? To be a single mother then was to be ruined, unemployable, shunned even.
What a !!!!!! article, I agree.0 -
How could you even pose such a stupid question? To be a single mother then was to be ruined, unemployable, shunned even.
What a !!!!!! article, I agree.
Really? I actually thought it was quite interesting - I didn't know people got benefits in the 1800s - at least not in quite such an organised way.
I think the "ruined, unemployable, shunned" thing came a bit later with the Victorians. I imagine for most of history single mothers were very common and the article says "the birth of illegitimate children to errant fathers was massively widespread during this period in history".0 -
When i started to do a family tree i found out that my Grandad was born in a workhouse in 1894, i came to a dead end trying to trace any information but from what i could make out his Mum must have been kicked out on the street by her parents when she got pregnant. I doubt that would happen today.
I have the same thing in my family tree. I can't get back any further either. However going forward I do know that the kids had to finish school and start work aged about 12, no comparison with today. Incidentally, some local councils hold workhouse records and you may be able to get a report from them.Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
0 -
-
£644 a week ...... it surely cannot be fair making people struggle to live on that?Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!0
-
People weren't expected to support their children beyond school-leaving age. If they were entitled to parish relief, they took it. Generally they couldn't afford not to.When i started to do a family tree i found out that my Grandad was born in a workhouse in 1894, i came to a dead end trying to trace any information but from what i could make out his Mum must have been kicked out on the street by her parents when she got pregnant.
But the general rule in that era was that the able-bodied couldn't get parish relief except by entering the workhouse. Otherwise, her parents may have been happy enough to have her at home.
Also, by that time, some workhouse maternity wards had acquired a reputation as a good place to have a baby, and girls with jobs would sometimes pauperise themselves to get in."It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards