We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Arrangement to Pay, Worse than Default??
stu2500
Posts: 193 Forumite
I have an account from 2009 on my credit file with an Arrangement to Pay warning. Is this worse than a default? Or just as bad?
0
Comments
-
Some lenders would probably consider it as bas as a default. Others probably not quite so bad. Its not worse than a default, as its a marker to show that you had a short term problem which you addressed and came to an agreement with your lender.
The old it gets the less of an impact it should have.A smile enriches those who receive without making poorer those who giveor "It costs nowt to be nice"0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards