We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Debt really is wealth..... Apparently.

An immensely interesting article in the FT today, that debunks the notion that excessive debt is holding back the UK economy.
Perhaps the most pernicious canard about the British economy is that growth is held back by heavily indebted consumers.

Only when household debt comes down, the story goes, can consumption growth get back to normal.

Nonsense.

Worse is the moralising tone, which insults millions of creditworthy households.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3f06ca5e-5d60-11e1-889d-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz1nPJGe5Yh


The article goes on to ask what changes when the author purchases a property at current house prices?

And notes that....
  • UK physical assets remain unchanged: a second-hand house merely changes hands.
  • UK financial liabilities rise as he has to use debt to purchase the home.
  • The purchase price goes to the vendor so UK financial assets also rise.
  • For the UK as a whole, the transaction raises both household debt and financial assets.

Also of interest, since 1995 household debt has risen from 104% of household income to 173% of household income, but household financial assets have risen more, from 360% of income to 442% of income.

So apparently, debt really IS wealth.

Good to know.;)
“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

-- President John F. Kennedy”
«134

Comments

  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Debt (based on assets) is only wealth if you can shift that asset on to someone else and release the cash. In terms of houses this is always difficult as you need somewhere to live.

    And that's a part of the problem right now.
  • MrRee_2
    MrRee_2 Posts: 2,389 Forumite
    What about the huge amount of savings which have been built up over the last few years, with little house movement going on and with people saving against possible disaster?

    Taking the fact that the downturn has lasted a full 4 years - 48 months - the majority of savers are sitting on savings in excess of £60,000 each.

    It's what they decide to do with it, that will drive the economy one way or the other.
    Bringing Happiness where there is Gloom!
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Nothing of substance in the article other than a personal opinion.
  • pqrdef
    pqrdef Posts: 4,552 Forumite
    Excessive paying off of debt must be holding back the economy. All that money going into overpayments when people could be out spending it.
    "It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,223 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    So if we all unilaterally declare that actually houses are now worth twice as much as they were yesterday then our assets to debt ratio improves even more - can anyone see a fallacy with this argument yet?
    I think....
  • nearlynew
    nearlynew Posts: 3,800 Forumite
    HPI cheerleaders are, by definition, debt junkies.

    It's as simple as that.
    "The problem with quotes on the internet is that you never know whether they are genuine or not" -
    Albert Einstein
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    michaels wrote: »
    So if we all unilaterally declare that actually houses are now worth twice as much as they were yesterday then our assets to debt ratio improves even more - can anyone see a fallacy with this argument yet?

    You offer me a million for my house, I'll offer you 2 million for yours and we'll leave it at that.

    We'll both be incredibly richer. As soon as we have exchanged offers, I'm off down to the Aston dealership with my new found wealth.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    And another one...

    If I take a loan for 20k, spend it on a brand new car and drive off the forecourt, am I wealthier than I was before I bought the car? I have the larger debt and the new asset....
  • MrRee wrote: »
    What about the huge amount of savings which have been built up over the last few years, with little house movement going on and with people saving against possible disaster?

    Taking the fact that the downturn has lasted a full 4 years - 48 months - the majority of savers are sitting on savings in excess of £60,000 each.

    It's what they decide to do with it, that will drive the economy one way or the other.


    They have all turned Japanese
    They are reacting to falling incomes from their savings/annuities etc and increased inflation by cutting their expenditure drastically.
    The Japanese savers (which is most of the population) did the same post their mega crash in ?early?1990's - cue their so called lost decade.
  • SecondLegDownIsTheBigOne
    SecondLegDownIsTheBigOne Posts: 334 Forumite
    edited 26 February 2012 at 2:36PM
    They have all turned Japanese
    They are reacting to falling incomes from their savings/annuities etc and increased inflation by cutting their expenditure drastically.
    The Japanese savers (which is most of the population) did the same post their mega crash in ?early?1990's - cue their so called lost decade.

    Savers are, by definition, adept at cutting expenditure. We are by no means a high income family, but we are saving more than ever, inflation and low interest rates are not encouraging us to spend. In fact, where I used to spend a portion of the interest on my savings on luxuries, I now don't. Admittedly, there might be a little bit of protest in my spending strike.
    1. The house price crash will begin.
    2. There will be a dead cat bounce.
    3. The second leg down will commence.
    4. I will buy your house for a song.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.