Restriction of pension tax relief to 20%

RenovationMan

TH1878 wrote: »

Maybe that cleaner should have worked a little bit harder. There are plenty of working class doctors.

You don't understand, the cleaner should just be able to become a doctor and get doctor's fees. He shouldn't have to train or work his way up or anything, that's just unfair.

Being a higher earner is unfair too.

TH1878

RenovationMan wrote: »

You don't understand, the cleaner should just be able to become a doctor and get doctor's fees. He shouldn't have to train or work his way up or anything, that's just unfair.

Being a higher earner is unfair too.

I can't work out if you're on the wind-up or not.

If you really are as crazy as you sound and you're not, consider this.

You have 2 'GPs' -

GP 1 did 5 years at medical school and 5 years post-graduate study
GP 2 worked in GP 1's surgery cleaning the toilet and decided to become a GP.

Given the choice, which would you take your child to see if they were ill?

You're paying for KATE - Knowledge, Advice, Time & Experience. GP1 has more knowledge, gives better advice and has more experience.

Edit : It's now clear that you're on the wind-up!

RenovationMan

It's unfair that you know all that stuff about KATE. I should know all that stuff about Kate and get the same money as you. Life is unfair.

chucknorris

TH1878 wrote: »

I can't work out if you're on the wind-up or not.

If you really are as crazy as you sound and you're not, consider this.

You have 2 'GPs' -

GP 1 did 5 years at medical school and 5 years post-graduate study
GP 2 worked in GP 1's surgery cleaning the toilet and decided to become a GP.

Given the choice, which would you take your child to see if they were ill?

You're paying for KATE - Knowledge, Advice, Time & Experience. GP1 has more knowledge, gives better advice and has more experience.

You are ignoring how unfair the system is, which is the very point we were discussing, therefore I would certainly take my child to see GP 2. But if I needed a cleaner I would hire GP 1.

Zelazny

TH1878 wrote: »

I can't work out if you're on the wind-up or not.

If you really are as crazy as you sound and you're not, consider this.

You have 2 'GPs' -

GP 1 did 5 years at medical school and 5 years post-graduate study
GP 2 worked in GP 1's surgery cleaning the toilet and decided to become a GP.

Given the choice, which would you take your child to see if they were ill?

You're paying for KATE - Knowledge, Advice, Time & Experience. GP1 has more knowledge, gives better advice and has more experience.

I wouldn't take my child to either - surely the whole point is that I'd make just as good a GP as either of them!

chucknorris

Zelazny wrote: »

I wouldn't take my child to either - surely the whole point is that I'd make just as good a GP as either of them!

Good point, I never thought of that! I wasn't being very MSE.