Employer seeking repayment of sick pay due to possible car accident payout

I was weighing up whether to post this here or in the insurance section (but plumped for here as it's more the employer rights side).

This is on behalf of a friend & wanted to know if anyone is more familiar with this scenario than I am (or have been able to find).

Friend was involved in a car accident when someone drove into them, as a result they have had to have time off work and the claim is ongoing due to injuries received from the accident.

They have now received a letter from their employer stating that if they receive any payout then they would be seeking repayment of sick pay that was given.

Not having been involved in such cases before this I guess is ensure that the party at fault covers all consequential losses, both of my friend and indirectly her employer.

A few questions arise, I'm hoping someone more knowledgeable can shed anymore light:-
1. Is this normal?
2. One would assume that they would just seek recovery of any 'enhanced' sick pay, in excess of SSP?
3. I guess this needs to be added to the claim

Will get them to talk to the folks handling their claim but wanted to try and get some additional info first.
«1

Comments

  • qazitory
    qazitory Posts: 308 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    To my knowledge this is normal as they just add the lost wages to the claim, and then this gets paid back to the employer.
    Quidco Earnings (since Dec 06): £467.75
  • hcb42
    hcb42 Posts: 5,962 Forumite
    yes i would say it is normal also
  • Torry_Quine
    Torry_Quine Posts: 18,865 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If the employer didn't get the sick pay repaid then your friend would be getting paid twice.
    Lost my soulmate so life is empty.

    I can bear pain myself, he said softly, but I couldna bear yours. That would take more strength than I have -
    Diana Gabaldon, Outlander
  • dseventy
    dseventy Posts: 1,220 Forumite
    The_Pedant wrote: »
    I was weighing up whether to post this here or in the insurance section (but plumped for here as it's more the employer rights side).

    This is on behalf of a friend & wanted to know if anyone is more familiar with this scenario than I am (or have been able to find).

    Friend was involved in a car accident when someone drove into them, as a result they have had to have time off work and the claim is ongoing due to injuries received from the accident.

    They have now received a letter from their employer stating that if they receive any payout then they would be seeking repayment of sick pay that was given.

    Not having been involved in such cases before this I guess is ensure that the party at fault covers all consequential losses, both of my friend and indirectly her employer.

    A few questions arise, I'm hoping someone more knowledgeable can shed anymore light:-
    1. Is this normal?
    2. One would assume that they would just seek recovery of any 'enhanced' sick pay, in excess of SSP?
    3. I guess this needs to be added to the claim

    Will get them to talk to the folks handling their claim but wanted to try and get some additional info first.

    Yes quite normal and standard practice.

    Look at this way.

    Your "friend" was completing their contracted duties and had an accident, not their fault. As a result of this accident, they were not able to complete their duties at work.

    Work stepped in and said "we will pay you for being off sick as per policies, but should you manage to claim back from the third party, we will also add our losses".

    Perfectly reasonable, and essential for a business!

    D70
    How about no longer being masochistic?
    How about remembering your divinity?
    How about unabashedly bawling your eyes out?
    How about not equating death with stopping?
  • vax2002
    vax2002 Posts: 7,187 Forumite
    Never heard of it applying to contractual sick pay, only SSP
    How would the employer know, the contract between you and your insurance is of no concern to the employer.
    Unless there is some statutory legislation that compels you to disclose it with your employer then they have no reason to know.
    SSP is different.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • I suggest that the claims company working on behalf of your friend has written to the employer and they have reacted to that letter rather than this statement coming directly from the employer with no prompting.

    The Claims company will have written to the employer so that they can calculate the claim for the employee/so they have all the full facts of who is to paid.

    Can your friend check with the claims company? They will have had a response from the employer.
  • Valli
    Valli Posts: 25,374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Since your (well his) employer has suffered a consequential loss as a result of the car accident and has had to pay out the sick pay they are, as far as I am aware, perfectly entitled to claim this back from the car insurer.
    Don't put it DOWN; put it AWAY
    "I would like more sisters, that the taking out of one, might not leave such stillness" Emily Dickinson
    :heart:Janice 1964-2016:heart:

    Thank you Honey Bear
  • Thanks everyone. As I said I can well understand why it happens and had a picture in my head of how it may work. I think the above will help before we can speak to folks again on Monday.
  • corbyboy
    corbyboy Posts: 1,169 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    The_Pedant wrote: »
    Thanks everyone. As I said I can well understand why it happens and had a picture in my head of how it may work. I think the above will help before we can speak to folks again on Monday.

    If your friend has specifically put in a claim for "loss of earnings" while they were receiving sick pay from their employer then why would they be able to keep it? They can't get paid twice!
  • ohreally
    ohreally Posts: 7,525 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If the employer is a public employer them the reimbursement becomes a contractual issue and thete may also be a duty placed on the employee to disclose all facts relating.
    Don’t be a can’t, be a can.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.