We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Occupational Pension Dilemma?

vigman
Posts: 1,384 Forumite


Second attempt...the tables scrambled on posting
Hi
I'm soon taking Tier 1 Ill Health retirement in my 59th year. The figures I seem to be quoted are a choice of 67K lump sum and 10K per annum or 20K lump sum and 14K per annum. At first I thought that the latter was the obvious choice but doing the sums I found that it won't be until I'm 69 that I start to 'lose out' by taking 4k less pa (however I will get state pension at 65):
AGE Lump Sum @ 58 £67,000.00 OR Lump Sum £20,000
58 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
59 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
60 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
61 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
62 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
63 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
64 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
65 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
66 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
67 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
68 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
69 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
Both totals = c £188,000.00 by age 69
Which option would astute MSE folk take? Obviously the 67K could be fed to interest earning accounts (I'd have to release c 10K pa from this). I am on standard Tax allowance
My head is spinning, so any advice appreciated, please?
Vigman
Hi
I'm soon taking Tier 1 Ill Health retirement in my 59th year. The figures I seem to be quoted are a choice of 67K lump sum and 10K per annum or 20K lump sum and 14K per annum. At first I thought that the latter was the obvious choice but doing the sums I found that it won't be until I'm 69 that I start to 'lose out' by taking 4k less pa (however I will get state pension at 65):
AGE Lump Sum @ 58 £67,000.00 OR Lump Sum £20,000
58 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
59 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
60 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
61 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
62 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
63 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
64 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
65 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
66 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
67 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
68 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
69 £10,000.00 £14,000.00
Both totals = c £188,000.00 by age 69
Which option would astute MSE folk take? Obviously the 67K could be fed to interest earning accounts (I'd have to release c 10K pa from this). I am on standard Tax allowance
My head is spinning, so any advice appreciated, please?
Vigman
Any information given in my posts or replies is intended to be of interest and/or help to members of the forum. I cannot guarantee that this is accurate or up to date.
0
Comments
-
At a commutation rate of 11.75% which is dire, I would go with the higher pension and lower lump sum. Your £67k lump sum is never going to make up for the loss of income. If you had plans to spend it fair enough.
How would you plan to realise £10kpa from £67k?
I would also assume that the pension is index linked and you don't seem to have accounted for this in your calculations.0 -
How would you plan to realise £10kpa from £67k?
"....choice of 67K lump sum and 10K per annum or 20K lump sum and 14K per annum..."
Why would you want to know how £67k would make £10k pa?
What you really want to know is how to make £4k pa from £47k.
And the answer is you would need 8,5% tax free interest and from some posts most people think this is an achievable rate with a bit of risk
fj0 -
Apologies for lack of clarity:
.....don't shoot me, please, but this is a Local Govt Final Salary pension scheme, so no annuities etc, just a choice of a higher lump sum and lower pa pension or vice versa. Annual pension linked to pay rise, so frozen in my case for the last 5 years and probably never more than 1% increase..
I can choose a 67K lump sum and then get paid 10K per annum, or choose a 20K lump sum and get paid 14K per annum.
Does this make any more sense??
TIA
VigmanAny information given in my posts or replies is intended to be of interest and/or help to members of the forum. I cannot guarantee that this is accurate or up to date.0 -
bigfreddiel wrote: »The above makes no sense!
"....choice of 67K lump sum and 10K per annum or 20K lump sum and 14K per annum..."
Why would you want to know how £67k would make £10k pa?
In answer to this statement from the OP.[Obviously the 67K could be fed to interest earning accounts (I'd have to release c 10K pa from this). I am on standard Tax allowancebigfreddiel wrote: »What you really want to know is how to make £4k pa from £47k.
No I didn't.And the answer is you would need 8,5% tax free interest and from some posts most people think this is an achievable rate with a bit of risk
Do tell us how.0 -
Apologies for lack of clarity:
.....don't shoot me, please, but this is a Local Govt Final Salary pension scheme, so no annuities etc, just a choice of a higher lump sum and lower pa pension or vice versa. Annual pension linked to pay rise, so frozen in my case for the last 5 years and probably never more than 1% increase..
LGPS increase for this year will be 5.2% (CPI last September).
Are you suggesting your increase is different to what is normally done?
http://www.lgps.org.uk/lge/core/page.do?pageId=101544I can choose a 67K lump sum and then get paid 10K per annum, or choose a 20K lump sum and get paid 14K per annum.
Does this make any more sense??
TIA
Vigman
It was clear the first time.
Question to you?
Do you need the higher income?0 -
I seem to be getting some other folks quotes attributed to my original posting.
What I meant to say was that if I took the 67K lump sum and annual pension of 10K, I would invest the 67K but allow for RELEASING 10K of this saving each year for spending to make my annual income 20K.
Therefore of the 67K I could put say 17K in a 6 year high interest account, 10K in a 5 year account, 10K in a 4 year account, 10k in a 3 year account, 10K in a 2 year acc and 10K in my current account for the first year's spending.
VigmanAny information given in my posts or replies is intended to be of interest and/or help to members of the forum. I cannot guarantee that this is accurate or up to date.0 -
Thanks Jem
I need the highest income.
In your first reply, you asked "How would you plan to realise £10kpa from £67k?" In my last posting I explained that I would spread the 67K lump sum in various accounts and then cash 10K of them annually and combine this with my annual pension of 10K.
Thanks for the interest info. I was told by work (and not the LGPS) that any rise would be the same as our current pay structure in a university so will check this out.
VigmanAny information given in my posts or replies is intended to be of interest and/or help to members of the forum. I cannot guarantee that this is accurate or up to date.0 -
Therefore of the 67K I could put say 17K in a 6 year high interest account, 10K in a 5 year account, 10K in a 4 year account, 10k in a 3 year account, 10K in a 2 year acc and 10K in my current account for the first year's spending.
Vigman
Savings accounts will never make up for the loss of £4kpa (more if it's index-linked as normal). You would have to have an account that will pay 10.625% gross just to break even with what you are giving up.0 -
Many thanks, Jem, excellent, clear reply!
VigmanAny information given in my posts or replies is intended to be of interest and/or help to members of the forum. I cannot guarantee that this is accurate or up to date.0 -
Since you've a target income of £20k I'll assume that you have a state pension forecast saying that your state pensions will be paying you at least £10k per year so that you can maintain £20k income with a £10k work pension plus £10k state pensions.
Looking at the numbers it appears that if you take the higher lump sum you will be worse off at these ages by these amounts:
70: £ 9k
75: £42k
80: £85k
85: £137k
If you take the smaller lump sum, to maintain £20k income you would need to borrow money starting at age 61, increasing to peak borrowing of £12k at age 64. From age 66 onwards you'd be in credit and ever-increasing surplus.
If no credit is available you could eliminate all but £100 of the borrowing by spending at £18,400 instead of £20,000.
After clearing the borrowing at age 66 your income would be £28k with the smaller lump sum or £23k with the bigger one, a difference that increases each year.
What this means to me is that if you have £12k of savings or £12k of borrowing facilities or can take a smaller income or any mixture you are likely to be substantially better off with the smaller lump sum unless you've reason to expect to die shortly after you reach state retirement age.
In calculating this I've assumed work and state pension increases of 3% a year and 2% as income from capital or cost of borrowing.pension income 14000 pension inflation increase 3 spending 20000 capital 20000 capital interest rate 2 state pensions 10000 age capital pension capital state final capital income income pensions 58 20000 14000 400 0 14400 59 14400 14420 288 0 9108 60 9108 14853 182 0 4143 61 4143 15298 83 0 -476 62 -476 15757 -10 0 -4729 63 -4729 16230 -95 0 -8593 64 -8593 16717 -172 0 -12048 65 -12048 17218 -241 10000 -5071 66 -5071 17735 -101 10300 2862 67 2862 18267 57 10609 11795 68 11795 18815 236 10927 21773 69 21773 19379 435 11255 32843 70 32843 19961 657 11593 45053 71 45053 20559 901 11941 58454 72 58454 21176 1169 12299 73098 73 73098 21812 1462 12668 89040 74 89040 22466 1781 13048 106334 75 106334 23140 2127 13439 125040 76 125040 23834 2501 13842 145217 77 145217 24549 2904 14258 166928 78 166928 25286 3339 14685 190237 79 190237 26044 3805 15126 215212 80 215212 26825 4304 15580 241922 81 241922 27630 4838 16047 270437 82 270437 28459 5409 16528 300834 83 300834 29313 6017 17024 333188 84 333188 30192 6664 17535 367579 85 367579 31098 7352 18061 404089 86 404089 32031 8082 18603 442805 87 442805 32992 8856 19161 483814 88 483814 33982 9676 19736 527208
pension income 10000 capital 67000 age capital pension capital state final capital income income pensions 58 67000 10000 1340 0 58340 59 58340 10300 1167 0 49807 60 49807 10609 996 0 41412 61 41412 10927 828 0 33167 62 33167 11255 663 0 25086 63 25086 11593 502 0 17180 64 17180 11941 344 0 9464 65 9464 12299 189 10000 11952 66 11952 12668 239 10300 15159 67 15159 13048 303 10609 19119 68 19119 13439 382 10927 23868 69 23868 13842 477 11255 29443 70 29443 14258 589 11593 35882 71 35882 14685 718 11941 43225 72 43225 15126 865 12299 51515 73 51515 15580 1030 12668 60792 74 60792 16047 1216 13048 71103 75 71103 16528 1422 13439 82493 76 82493 17024 1650 13842 95009 77 95009 17535 1900 14258 108702 78 108702 18061 2174 14685 123622 79 123622 18603 2472 15126 139824 80 139824 19161 2796 15580 157361 81 157361 19736 3147 16047 176291 82 176291 20328 3526 16528 196673 83 196673 20938 3933 17024 218569 84 218569 21566 4371 17535 242041 85 242041 22213 4841 18061 267156 86 267156 22879 5343 18603 293981 87 293981 23566 5880 19161 322588 88 322588 24273 6452 19736 353048
Inflation-linked increases to the pension income are a critical factor to consider.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards