We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Stephen Hestor renders to the lynch mob
Comments
-
And that's another example of the banker's greed. I think we can safely say it wouldn't have been going through the payroll on his payslip subject to normal tax and NIC! For a couple of decades, the Treasury has been ducking and diving trying to close the loopholes exploited by the banks to avoid paying tax and/or NIC on these massive bonuses. They were paid in gold bullion to avoid NIC, until Treasury stopped it, then they were paid in wine, until the Treasury stopped in, then some kind of foreign currency or derivative, etc. The Treasury were trying to hit a moving target for years and the bankers were putting their all into finding new schemes to avoid having to pay tax/nic. There is absolutely no way that the bankers have willingly and voluntarily paid the same tax/NIC that any normal worker would have paid on their bonuses. They've been dragged kicking and screaming into paying the "right" amount of tax/NIC! If it isn't bad enough that the bankers have been getting huge bonuses, it's a disgrace that they tried so hard to avoid paying the right tax/nic on their bonuses.
what you say is indeed true
however the whole ethos of this website is to reduce your tax /NI and maximise ones own advantage in any legal way.
Yes, I admit it, I do use my ISA allowance each year with a view to paying less tax.
And pay into a pension fund in the full knowledge that it reduces my NI and tax (salary sacrifice)0 -
Rochdale_Pioneers wrote: »Then the Chairman turns down his bonus which kind of makes that position an obvious lie quickly exposed.
Lie?
A board member voluntarily giving up their bonus is very different to imposed sanctions.
RBS made their position in any government influence very clear.
Trying to spin this as Cameron lying is a bit much.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Lie?
A board member voluntarily giving up their bonus is very different to imposed sanctions.
RBS made their position in any government influence very clear.
Trying to spin this as Cameron lying is a bit much.
That's Labour's message - blame the current government for the legacies they put in place while in power.
There is an anger emerging from the Labour party that is akin to that of the tea party. Its a style that defies rational thought & logic.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards