We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Uk aaa?

2»

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    tomterm8 wrote: »
    This explains why Japan has been running along quite happily with 200% debt to gdp for the last decade, whereas eurozone countries are in crises with much smaller debts.

    Unlike Europe including the UK. The Japanese had large levels of personal savings. So there has been money to buy Government debt. There wasn't such a reliance on international markets to provide funding.
  • lvader
    lvader Posts: 2,579 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Unlike Europe including the UK. The Japanese had large levels of personal savings. So there has been money to buy Government debt. There wasn't such a reliance on international markets to provide funding.

    Japan also has a very strong currency so can't inflate debt away.
  • ManAtHome
    ManAtHome Posts: 8,512 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    You're a bit out of date gen, people have been allowed to use Drawdown instead of buying annuities for a number of years and recently the rules on drawdown have been modified (or are about to be) to remove the upper age limit.
    Meanwhile, in the real world... http://www.lovemoney.com/news/savings-investments-pensions/pensions/11409/five-crucial-pension-facts

    From the article
    the average size of the pension pot is just £25,000. I stress the word ‘average.’ Obviously, some pension pots are much smaller. According to Legal & General, 34% of pension pots are worth less than £10,000.
    - good luck with the drawdown for the little peeps!

    Same as with ZIRP+inflation - the people just about managing get the brown end of the stick whilst "merv the magnificent" (check out how the NICE decade was down to MPC, not "external factors") and his banksta/MP mates get to enhance their already platinum-plated pensions.
  • ManAtHome wrote: »
    Meanwhile, in the real world... http://www.lovemoney.com/news/savings-investments-pensions/pensions/11409/five-crucial-pension-facts

    From the article
    - good luck with the drawdown for the little peeps!

    Same as with ZIRP+inflation - the people just about managing get the brown end of the stick whilst "merv the magnificent" (check out how the NICE decade was down to MPC, not "external factors") and his banksta/MP mates get to enhance their already platinum-plated pensions.

    So you're saying I'm wrong and that all pensioners are forced to buy an annuity?
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    So you're saying I'm wrong and that all pensioners are forced to buy an annuity?

    I might be out of date but AIUI, company pension schemes are still forced to buy bonds for retirees in defined benefit funds.

    Vivatifosi will be along before too long no doubt to put us straight.

    Financial repression can take many forms from fixed exchange rates through to confiscation of assets.
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    Gilts have been bought to levels which are likely to be unsustainable in the longer term.

    A sub 3 % yield across all maturities is unthinkable IMHO.

    Gilts look expensive to me against Treasuries, Bunds, Equities and Current Inflation expectations.

    A reverse looks on the cards in the near term, and any downgrade possibility will only accelerate the reverse.
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • sabretoothtigger
    sabretoothtigger Posts: 10,036 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    edited 24 January 2012 at 11:31AM
    A reverse has been due for 3 or 4 years. There is a bias to countries which do QE, Euro seems to be suffering from lack of it at least in perception. It is quite funny that we are rated better then the Germans when they export so much and we do not.

    I like that London may become a main dealer for Chinese currency, this could help reinforce this secondary reserve currency thing we have going for us.
    Could it be we are Not too hot, not too cold just right, remember the goldilocks thing. That didnt work out for Brown, we got the 3 bears all right :p

    Everyone who has lent money to the government has done so at a loss.

    But relative to the money they are printing, its a profit due to rising bond prices. Something not right here


    I think it was Argentina government not that long ago that mandated all pensions to buy their government bonds exclusively
    In 2008, Argentina seized private pension funds because the government was having trouble raising the money it needed in the normal ways: taxing and borrowing.

    Could it happen here?

    No. It’s unconstitutional.

    Last 12 words of the Fifth Amendment:

    …nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.

    Can’t they get around that?

    Sort of. What they do instead is financial repression.

    That means they essentially outlaw all forms of savings other than putting your money into banks. For your safety.

    Then they outlaw the banks putting their deposits anywhere but in U.S. government bonds. For your safety.


    In the USA its already the case the biggest owner of government debt is the various welfare and pension schemes


    With housing prices I think it was rental rates that showed how wrong buying was at that time. Im not sure what bonds have to be compared to show what will tip the scales. But at some point it will be much more profitable to not bother with them
  • worldtraveller
    worldtraveller Posts: 14,013 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Fitch Ratings revised down its outlook on Britain's AAA rating to negative on Wednesday, warning the nation faced a greater than 1-in-2 chance of losing its top-notch status in the next couple of years if the government eases back on its debt-cutting measures.

    Reuters
    There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, There is society, where none intrudes, By the deep sea, and music in its roar: I love not man the less, but Nature more...
  • Neverland
    Neverland Posts: 271 Forumite
    Generali wrote: »
    I've been banging on about this for ages and few people seem to believe me but the obvious (and possible only) way out of the problem is more financial repression. That is that you force people to buy bonds that may not want to do so.

    This is already being done through the pensions system as you are forced to buy an annuity and your annuity provider is forced to invest in bonds. It would be possible to, for example, force banks to buy more bonds by increasing the reserve requirement (the owners of banks pay the price of this, that is to say the shareholders being you via your pension fund and nationalization). Anyone heard if banks are being required to increase reserves anywhere?

    My guess is that the next step will be forcing people to invest a proportion of their pension into bonds.

    The UK can simply print money to repay the debt. IIRC however, the debt agencies take financial repression through inflation into account when rating countries and ultimately of you systemically attempt to 'inflate away the debt' lenders will force you to borrow in USD or EUR.

    For what its worth, I believe you

    We aren't an AAA country either
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178K Life & Family
  • 260.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.