We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply
Mortgage and deeds
karenfingerhut
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hi there
I've had mixed feedback regarding the following, so I'm hoping someone can help me.
I'm in the process of buying a property with my partner. I'm the greater earner and makes sense for the mortgage to be in my name even though all payments will be 50/50 including the deposit.
My question is - can I be solely on the mortgage and my partner be on the deeds with me, or do we need to get a separate contract drawn up by a solicitor?
I would appreciate any advice on this.
Thanks and kind regards
Karen
I've had mixed feedback regarding the following, so I'm hoping someone can help me.
I'm in the process of buying a property with my partner. I'm the greater earner and makes sense for the mortgage to be in my name even though all payments will be 50/50 including the deposit.
My question is - can I be solely on the mortgage and my partner be on the deeds with me, or do we need to get a separate contract drawn up by a solicitor?
I would appreciate any advice on this.
Thanks and kind regards
Karen
0
Comments
-
karenfingerhut wrote: »I'm in the process of buying a property with my partner. I'm the greater earner and makes sense for the mortgage to be in my name even though all payments will be 50/50 including the deposit.
If you are purchasing it jointly. Why shouldn't your partner have an equal share.0 -
It may be possible to have a borrower named on the mortgage not on the deeds, but not the other way round. Those named on the deeds must be party to the mortgage.
That's a justification for being first applicant, not sole applicant.I'm the greater earner and makes sense for the mortgage to be in my nameI am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.0 -
Thank you for the advice kingstreet. Youve cleared the matter up for me.
Kind regards
Karen0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
