We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Higher rate tax

13»

Comments

  • WestonDave
    WestonDave Posts: 5,154 Forumite
    Rampant Recycler
    pqrdef wrote: »
    What if her kids aren't yours? They claw back from you benefit you don't get, paid in respect of kids that aren't yours? Can't see it.

    Another issue they haven't thought through! If they are to make the existing proposals legally workable its going to require very very tight drafting of legislation and all sorts of "what ifs" being covered.
    Adventure before Dementia!
  • drc
    drc Posts: 2,057 Forumite
    I think they should just limit child benefits to 2 children (which is the replacement rate) and then if you want to have more, do so but pay for them yourself. At the moment, they are planning to penalise those people that bother to work, whereas large families who keep having kids that they cannot afford (and where no-one works) will continue to get the benefits. Not only does this discourage people to better themselves, but in an already overcrowded world, it encourages people to have more and more kids for the income they can get.

    Either that or scrap all benefits for children for everyone and raise the income tax threshold so low earners keep most of their salary and work is encouraged.
  • pqrdef
    pqrdef Posts: 4,552 Forumite
    drc wrote: »
    At the moment, they are planning to penalise those people that bother to work
    It's supposed to be a gesture to prove that we're all in this together and those with the broad backs are also suffering.

    Some such sacrifice is necessary before people can really enjoy cutting welfare benefits.
    "It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
  • LisaW123
    LisaW123 Posts: 543 Forumite
    The world is over populated. People should not receive incentives to have children.
  • worldtraveller
    worldtraveller Posts: 14,013 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Personally I don't see why those without children should subsidise the lifestyle choice of those that do at all.
    There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, There is society, where none intrudes, By the deep sea, and music in its roar: I love not man the less, but Nature more...
  • Personally I don't see why those without children should subsidise the lifestyle choice of those that do at all.

    I wonder if you'll still be saying that when these same children are working and paying for your state pension, hospital and care home?
  • worldtraveller
    worldtraveller Posts: 14,013 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 13 January 2012 at 4:38PM
    I wonder if you'll still be saying that when these same children are working and paying for your state pension, hospital and care home?

    I really don't see what that has to do with paying benefits to people who chose to have children, apart from those in hardship IMO.
    There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, There is a rapture on the lonely shore, There is society, where none intrudes, By the deep sea, and music in its roar: I love not man the less, but Nature more...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.