We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Running out of time Mis sold endowment
Comments
-
The policy contains life insurance, critical illness etc which is not needed as I don't have any debt and no dependents
Why would you not have a need for critical illness cover?0 -
I have other savings plans and whilst I see some merit in critical illness cover, I don't personally see the need for it as I don't have any dependents or debts. Unless there are any other benefits I'm unaware of?0
-
The bank advised me that I cannot remove these elements of the policy and thereby lower the monthly premiums - is this right?
That is correct.Also, would an endowment policy have an element of PPI and be valid for a claim if mis sold?
What makes you think that having PPI would make it valid for mis-sale? As it happens, it doesnt.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
I have other savings plans and whilst I see some merit in critical illness cover, I don't personally see the need for it as I don't have any dependents or debts. Unless there are any other benefits I'm unaware of?
A critical illness can wipe out savings very quickly. So a single person with no dependents insuring against such an outcome makes sense.
If it's a with profits policy you could make it "paid up" which would mean the cover reduces and the premium ceases but the money remains invested.
Alternatively surrender it if it doesn't meet your present objectives - assuming you are prepared to accept any loss of bonuses and possible mortgage guarantee that this could impact.0 -
CI cover on diagnosis, would pay you a lump sum and effectively make provision for your daily living costs/repayment of os debts etc, which will be invaluable when/if you became unable to work due to the illness ..
It must also be noted that not all critical illnesses are short term or indeed lead to a premature death, individuals can and do respond to treatment/go into remission, returning to "normal" life afterwards (as I have witnessed myself) - so having such a policy to "carry you" through would certainly be beneficial, especially if you use the proceeds to repay your mortgage or debts. Of course the individual, for many reasons, may not be able to return to their previous role or income level, so the policy having vested and used to repay liabilities would again be a valuable tool in reducing your outgoings and relieving some monetarty pressures you may be under.
Single with no dependants, yes you could argue life assurance isn't an absolute necessity (if you don't have debts or simply require your estate to be disposed of to satisfy your o/s liabilites instead of leaving it to you family etc), but income protection for those of a working age (of which I would class CI as a relation of) in my opinion certainly is.
Now, you may well be able to source a comparible standalone CI policy that is cheaper than your endowment policy, but do remember the other benefits that will be lost.
Hope this helps
Holly0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards