We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply

First Direct Mortgage Offer Error (3 yrs on)

I have received a letter from FD advising the mortgage offer letter and/or the key facts document, supplied 3.5 yrs ago had an error on it.
The error was incorrect fees and an underestimation of the amount to be repaid on the mortgage overall and per £ borrowed.

The letter is very clear in that I have been paying enough, not hard as i overpay on an offset product.

My question really is does this affect the agreement i entered in to?
Am i right in assuming the key facts and mortgage offer documents are legally binding? If so, does this make the contract voidable.

I am tied into a 6% deal for another 18 months with £2k in fees to get out of it. Obviously FD are moving on that. Can i use this turn of events to leverage that decision ie can i ask them to change my deal for free?

My thinking is the information provided back then formed the basis of my decision. If its wrong my decision may have been wrong. The reasonable solution would be to allow me to make a new 'right' decision.

Whats your thoughts?

thanks

Comments

  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    An estimate is not a contractual term, merely a guide. As interest rates fluctuate over the term of the mortgage.

    You would have choosen your mortgage on the headline product rate. Not on possibly charges over a 25 year period.

    So the argument holds no substance.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.