We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply
When to appoint conveyancer
scrivomcdivo
Posts: 132 Forumite
We recently applied for a mortgage in principal which was successful and subsequently placed an offer on a property which was accepted. The estate agents are now putting pressure on us to appoint a conveyancer as soon as possible. Nonetheless, we still have to return back to HSBC tomorrow to finalise the mortgage paperwork and confirm the offer and then we need to get a survey carried out before potentially renegotiating with the vendor on anything picked up on the survey.
I believe that we should only appoint a conveyancer once we have a) finalised the mortgage offer and signed the paperwork and b) the survey has been carried out any any issues addressed / negotiated. Is this correct? I just don't want to appoint a conveyancer only for there to be a problem with the aforementioned which results in the purchase being cancelled and us having to pay the conveyancer for the work already done by them. I just don't want to give in to any pressure from the estate agent.
Thanks
PS: I appreciate this isn't directly a financial issue although it kinda is so I don't lose money on the purchase falling through
I believe that we should only appoint a conveyancer once we have a) finalised the mortgage offer and signed the paperwork and b) the survey has been carried out any any issues addressed / negotiated. Is this correct? I just don't want to appoint a conveyancer only for there to be a problem with the aforementioned which results in the purchase being cancelled and us having to pay the conveyancer for the work already done by them. I just don't want to give in to any pressure from the estate agent.
Thanks
PS: I appreciate this isn't directly a financial issue although it kinda is so I don't lose money on the purchase falling through
0
Comments
-
You should have a solicitor ready to act on your behalf. Until you have a mortgage offer then little work will be done. Your lender will also need to approve the solicitor as they work on their behalf as well.0
-
You won't get a mortgage offer without a solicitor being in place.
Decide who you are going to use. Tell them and instruct them to do nothing that incurs cost until such time as you advise them otherwise.
That time will be either:
a) Before valuation because you need them to move fast or
b) After valuation, once you're happy with the content of the report0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards