We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

CSA - opting out?

13»

Comments

  • MJMum
    MJMum Posts: 580 Forumite
    That's because the new parent should not be deemed to be responsible for caring for children that are not theirs! If they split up, then, as there is only 1 career allowance, it has to be split.

    kelloggs36, I don't think that you read my post correctly.

    A leaves B and takes child AB with her. Moves in with new partner, X, and has another child AX.

    A decides to stay home and look after AX and AB.

    As you point out, there is only 1 carer's allowance, as this is exactly what it says - for the carer.

    Why exactly should the NRP, B, subsidise the care of child AX? Since if A and X were no longer together, X would have to pay half the carer's allowance. But because they are together, he does not. :confused:
    Don't see the point anymore in offering advice to people who only want to be agreed with...
  • ++

    Yep - when my ex-partner got married I was still assessed for the full carers allowance even though she wasn't working and had the additional support of her new husband...

    Now that they've divorced after having 2 more children there are two NRPs so we both 'should' pay 50% of the carers allowance...

    Hang on - is there a set figure for carers allowance? Also why is it a 50/50 split when he's the father of two..? Does my child require more looking after - or are his just put in a box somewhere..??

    Oh - I just remembered for some reason there's no record of a case against him via the CSA so it's largely academic...

    ++
  • kelloggs36
    kelloggs36 Posts: 7,712 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Under the old rules there is allowance for this - however, as you already pointed out, there is no claim so it can't be split. It does work out when PWC is claiming against all the relevant NRPs. You case doesn't work because for some reason, there is no claim against the other person! This needs to be sorted out properly.


    Yes it is a 50/50 split usually, but the carers allowance reduces when youngest child reaches 11 or 12 again at 14 and disappears altogether at 16. There is only 1 carer's allowance regardless of number of children. i shall dig out my forms which show how to work it out and study them as it give instructions on how to do assessments and try to give you details. It is extremely complicated, but not impossible to work out.

    I can try and do a made up assessment to help? Can you just confirm as much as you can, the circumstances again? i.e. you, ex and how many children? How many kids does she have with other NRP? Does he work? Cheers!
  • MJMum
    MJMum Posts: 580 Forumite
    Under the old rules there is allowance for this

    Not under the circumstances I have described? (Sorry to OP for thread crashing, I know it's not helpful to you but I am curious...)
    Don't see the point anymore in offering advice to people who only want to be agreed with...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 605K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.8K Life & Family
  • 262.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.