Parent buying their kids a home outright

My father recently read an article that Bernie Ecclestone, the Formula 1 boss, bought his daughter a £45 million home.

Ok, so this is an extreme example but he would like to know what tax implications there are if a parent bought their son/ daughter a flat outright and expected no rent or repayment.

Any insight would be appreciated.

Merry Xmas
«1

Comments

  • Mikeyorks
    Mikeyorks Posts: 10,377 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It's a gift - so no tax implications to the beneficiary. Only a potential one to the donor (estate) if they should die within 7 years.
    If you want to test the depth of the water .........don't use both feet !
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    well none really
    we have no gift taxes in the UK so you can give whatever you like to anyone you like

    of course if your estate is liable to IHT (i.e. over 325,000 or 650,000 jointly with spouse ) then any gifts made in the last 7 years before you die may be liable to IHT
  • arambol
    arambol Posts: 120 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Thanks for clearing that up.
  • kidmugsy
    kidmugsy Posts: 12,709 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I wonder whether Ecclestone did buy them houses, or whether he gifted the money into trusts and the trusts bought the houses. Or the trusts lent the youngsters the money, secured on the houses.
    Free the dunston one next time too.
  • ognum
    ognum Posts: 4,879 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    How many people a year do this?
  • le_loup
    le_loup Posts: 4,047 Forumite
    ognum wrote: »
    How many people a year do this?
    Where do you think such records are kept? If you did it, would I know about it?
  • CKhalvashi
    CKhalvashi Posts: 12,130 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If I did it through my company, the house would be a company asset.

    Perhaps the most moneysaving thing to do with this is similar to an HMRC loophole we do with company cars when they hit 2 years old; Sell to my OH for £1,000 each, then after paying 20% vat, sell the cars for their true value.

    This is common with many taxi drivers/other driving companies, and although a bit sneaky, it’s perfectly legal.

    C
    💙💛 💔
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    CKhalvashi wrote: »
    If I did it through my company, the house would be a company asset.

    Perhaps the most moneysaving thing to do with this is similar to an HMRC loophole we do with company cars when they hit 2 years old; Sell to my OH for £1,000 each, then after paying 20% vat, sell the cars for their true value.

    This is common with many taxi drivers/other driving companies, and although a bit sneaky, it’s perfectly legal.

    C


    are you sure that this works with houses?
  • cte1111
    cte1111 Posts: 7,390 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    If he could afford to buy it out of his disposal income, without any drop in his lifestyle, then it is unlikely to fall under inheritance tax rules, even if he did die shortly after. Surprising but true. Usually applied for things like school fees for grandchildren but in Bernie's case, likely to apply to him too owing to his wealth.
  • jimmo
    jimmo Posts: 2,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    CKhalvashi wrote: »
    Perhaps the most moneysaving thing to do with this is similar to an HMRC loophole we do with company cars when they hit 2 years old; Sell to my OH for £1,000 each, then after paying 20% vat, sell the cars for their true value.

    This is common with many taxi drivers/other driving companies, and although a bit sneaky, it’s perfectly legal.

    C
    I do hope your opinion is based on something you have learned down the pub rather than the professional opinion of your accountant.
    You refer to “my company”.
    Assuming you are a director of a limited company, if that limited company sells a car to your wife for less than the true market value then either your wife, if she is also a director, or you (if she is not) are chargeable to tax on the benefit (sale at undervalue) your employer has provided.
    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/eimanual/EIM20504.htm
    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/eimanual/EIM21655.htm
    A self-employed person, as opposed to a company director, may get away with selling a bit of “plant or machinery” to his wife at undervalue but a company director won’t.
    Even then there is anti avoidance legislation within the Capital Allowances regime. However, there are all sorts conditions depending on whether the car concerned was purchased by the business before or after April 2009.
    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/camanual/CA23527.htm
    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/camanual/CA23560.htm
    Too many variables on this thread for a definitive answer but if anybody is breaking the anti-avoidance rules they are in serious danger of being suspected of tax evasion if HMRC catch up with them.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 243K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.5K Life & Family
  • 255.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.