We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Average family will have to save for more than 30 years to raise first deposit

Saving for deposit on a home 'will take 31 years'... but in 1993 it only took eight

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2071421/Saving-deposit-home-31-years--1993-took-eight.html

Estate%20agents.jpg
«13456710

Comments

  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    It's only because of those mean banks. Nothing to do with price rises in recent years. HPI is a good thing, you see. If the banks would reduce their deposit requirements, or preferably remove them, everything would be fine. ;)

    Or maybe this is the fallout from several years of a "fast and loose" property/mortgage market.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • chewmylegoff
    chewmylegoff Posts: 11,469 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    newDude wrote: »
    Saving for deposit on a home 'will take 31 years'... but in 1993 it only took eight

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2071421/Saving-deposit-home-31-years--1993-took-eight.html

    Estate%20agents.jpg

    Seems fairly stupid.

    Their figure isn't for an average family but for a family with earnings of £18.5k trying to buy a house for £125k. No real attempt here to come up with credible numbers, just some made up sensationalist drivel. Which is no surprise given the source.
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    It's a shame the title doesn't hint that the focus of the article is about how evil letting agents and greedy landlords are emptying the pockets of people so they have nothing left over to save.
  • justjohn
    justjohn Posts: 2,260 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 8 December 2011 at 8:59AM
    This average person on 18.5k wanting a 125k house, Is this also the average person that mis manages money or is it the average thrifty spender?

    Just read the artictle....

    "Putting away £930 a year, it would take them 31 years to save the deposit of £28,750 – or 23 per cent of the price of the house – required to get a mortgage"

    Why is it 23%?(assume that is because of the mortgage multiplier)

    The average person does not always buy the average house never mind the first time buyer.

    Most first time buyers are at bottom end of market.
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    Headline "Average family will have to save for more than 30 years to raise first deposit"

    Well whats an average family?
    The report considered low to middle-income families bringing in between £12,000 and £42,000 a year.It established an average of £18,600

    Oh right I get it. An average family is an average of low to middle income families - no bias there then.

    I don't buy newspapers for this very reason - in this case I actually begrudge the bandwidth I've just wasted.
  • justjohn
    justjohn Posts: 2,260 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    wotsthat wrote: »

    I don't buy newspapers for this very reason - in this case I actually begrudge the bandwidth I've just wasted.

    lol..........
  • quantic
    quantic Posts: 1,024 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    It's a shame the title doesn't hint that the focus of the article is about how evil letting agents and greedy landlords are emptying the pockets of people so they have nothing left over to save.

    While I agree with what your saying, I don't think these BTL landlords are driving around in Ferrari's like the media would have you believe. I think its more a case of "if you can't beat them"... I know quite a few people who have BTL properties and while some of them are fairly well off its far from the glamourous lifestyle many people perceive it to be.

    Many people who do BTL are just trying to make ends meet as well, and things they do like not maintaining the property is not because they want to be greedy, they just dont make enough from the property overall to have anything left to do it.

    The owner of the other semi that ours is attached to, charges more in rent than we pay in mortgage so it may seem like the tenants are getting a raw deal, but the owners make a loss.
  • quantic
    quantic Posts: 1,024 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Additionally, this might be a very naive view, but I always thought it was best to save up for a house BEFORE having the family?
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    justjohn wrote: »

    The average person does not always buy the average house never mind the first time buyer.

    Most first time buyers are at bottom end of market.

    To be fair, £125k isn't the average house either.

    Infact it's below the average FTB house, which, last time I read, was £136k.
  • DaddyBear
    DaddyBear Posts: 1,208 Forumite
    quantic wrote: »
    Additionally, this might be a very naive view, but I always thought it was best to save up for a house BEFORE having the family?



    The average age of a first time buyer is mid thirtys. Many don't want to risk waiting that long..... Increased incidence of birth defects, higher miscarriage rates, bigger maternal risks, risks of infertility..... Etc.
    This is the sad state the country has been left in because of ten years of stupidity.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.