We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

House market final props could soon collapse

11011131516

Comments

  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    wotsthat wrote: »
    That's a reflection of just how bad the economy is - just think what it would be like if rates had risen.

    Risen around 2005 ?

    And the FSA had been doing their job at the same time ?

    I think things wouldn't be in quite such a mess as they are now.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    DervProf wrote: »
    Risen around 2005 ?

    And the FSA had been doing their job at the same time ?

    I think things wouldn't be in quite such a mess as they are now.

    Ahh I see. The BoE should raise rates as a moral signal now to make up for not doing it in 2005?

    I think rates should have risen before 2007 too. Whilst I'm at it I wish the government had spent less money, paid down some national debt and let HBOS, Northern Rock & Bradford and Bingley go bust.

    I think things wouldn't be in quite such a mess as they are now.

    An interest rate now won't make up for any of that.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    wotsthat wrote: »
    let HBOS, Northern Rock & Bradford and Bingley go bust.

    With it the UK property market. Which would have decimated the remaining solvent banks as well.
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    With it the UK property market. Which would have decimated the remaining solvent banks as well.

    Depositors could have been protected and the mortgage books sold off. Virgin were itching to get into retail banking even then and there were rumours at the time that Tesco were trying to get into retail banking too. Santander seem to have been sniffing out bargains too.

    Lloyds may not have needed bailing out if they hadn't made the suicidal decision to take over HBOS.

    I'm not so sure that the UK property market would have gone bust (supported by a shortage of availability) and the total bailout cost to the UK tax payer may well have been lower.

    HBOS, Northern Rock and Bradford and Bingley were exactly the type of businesses that capitalism should have been allowed to destroy with the minimum of government intervention.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    wotsthat wrote: »
    Lloyds may not have needed bailing out if they hadn't made the suicidal decision to take over HBOS.

    Was it Lloyds themselves who made the decision, or could there have been a little "persuasion" by Mr. G. Brown & Co. ?
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    wotsthat wrote: »
    Ahh I see. The BoE should raise rates as a moral signal now to make up for not doing it in 2005?

    I think rates should have risen before 2007 too. Whilst I'm at it I wish the government had spent less money, paid down some national debt and let HBOS, Northern Rock & Bradford and Bingley go bust.

    I think things wouldn't be in quite such a mess as they are now.

    An interest rate now won't make up for any of that.

    Doing what you don't want to do now, can often make life better in the future.

    "Light touch" (no touch, more like) regulation by the FSA was a large reason for our banks getting into bed the those naughty Americans. Had the FSA being doing what they should have been, then maybe our banks would not have been caught out so badly. Of course, many of those "clever" mortgage products may not have been available, with wouldn't have help to stoke the property market. I sat there watching the financial news, waiting for the carnage.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    DervProf wrote: »
    Was it Lloyds themselves who made the decision, or could there have been a little "persuasion" by Mr. G. Brown & Co. ?


    the board of Lloyds were paid millions of pounds a year because they there the best that money could buy

    it was their job to do proper due diligence and resist pressure from Brown and Co.

    they failed miserably because they were no better than a guy earning 100k (bear that in mind everytime very high salaries are paid because we need the 'best' people)

    but walked off with lots of money so I guess they will have a comfortable retirement
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    DervProf wrote: »
    Was it Lloyds themselves who made the decision, or could there have been a little "persuasion" by Mr. G. Brown & Co. ?

    The Lloyds directors had a responsibility to their shareholders who they failed. Gordon Brown was in a pickle as he found himself in the position of contemplating another bailout of another bank of limited strategic importance.

    Lloyds had been looking at HBOS for years and just couldn't resist. About this time they increased their dividend - idiots.
  • wotsthat
    wotsthat Posts: 11,325 Forumite
    DervProf wrote: »
    Doing what you don't want to do now, can often make life better in the future.

    Agreed. I'm struggling to see how this applies to increasing interest rates when we're facing a recession and seeing inflation falling though.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    wotsthat wrote: »
    Agreed. I'm struggling to see how this applies to increasing interest rates when we're facing a recession and seeing inflation falling though.

    I`ve suggested that rates should be increased if there is a hint that he economy will allow it. I suspect, given recent history, that the BoE won't be able to resist the urge to enjoy "just one more wafer thin mint".
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.