We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Got this e-mail
Comments
- 
            
 They aren't all in care homes though - and most will never be.
 Unfortunately the jails only hold about 80,000, whereas the number of pensioners runs to millions.
 They like to keep them in their own homes for as long as possible.... sitting immobile all day every day, with the only "highlight" being the sight of a rushed carer dashing in to microwave a meal for one once a day.0
- 
            PasturesNew wrote: »They aren't all in care homes though - and most will never be.
 They like to keep them in their own homes for as long as possible.... sitting immobile all day every day, with the only "highlight" being the sight of a rushed carer dashing in to microwave a meal for one once a day.
 Or they are learning new languages or other things at U3A, walking through the Staffordshire Moorlands and other gorgeous bits of our Country; or, like me, and the regulars at the pool, swimming a mile three times a week.
 Being a pensioner covers quite a broad spectrum!0
- 
            Pobby's original post: 1) They MUST retire.
 Ten million job openings - unemployment fixed
 Pobby, they did this virtually in South Africa. It led to all kinds of problems, losing the experience of older employees is not such an advantage. It was almost done at my last job here in the UK, where voluntary redundancies were taken up with alacrity by people over 50 who could retire early on super pensions and with hundreds in VR payments. I don't know the effect of that as I left a year or so afterwards (at 62).
 Just saying that there might be other considerations with leaving a youngish workforce. Of course it might be a good thing, stripping away the dead wood - but I don't think so.0
- 
            We often here of the high unemployment for the young yet there is a real problem for the over 50`s. Due to my breakdown, I lost a long standing sales agency. No warning, no sympathy, just tough, your out. Thankfully the civil law has something to say about this but it is the stress of involving solicitors and stuff that I well do without.
 So at 62+ I guess that is it for me. 40 years of experience tossed aside. However I am mending which is the main thing and a bit of benefits helps very much.
 Your point about getting rid of older staff strikes a note. There are much younger people doing my job and frankly some of their attitudes suck. Just because it is in the music wholesale industry is no excuse for visiting customers wearing clothing that I might wear gardening. What ever happened to a professional approach. More interested in rushing home early to play the evening gig. Oh well, just call me the grumpster.0
- 
            That idea is Labour policy on steriods.0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
          
         