We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Autumn Statement

1235»

Comments

  • dori2o
    dori2o Posts: 8,150 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    There was absolutely nothing in the statement that you feel could really make the UK great again.

    Where is the help for manufacturing? We need to start producing again.

    All the talk again from the 'financial analysists' on the radio was about the Financial Sector and how this is the sector to lead the recovery.

    What happened the last time we put all our eggs into their basket?

    An interesting comment from someone to do with the Fuel protestors. They claim that to reduce fuel duty , even by as little as 20%, would boost the economy as the money people save at the pump would be spent in the town, and the government wouldn't really miss the tax take at the pump, as it would be given back in the form of extra VAT from the purchases and Corporation Taxes.

    The most annoying thing was the continued attack on the public sector, yet there is money available for a 5.2% increase in benefits.

    I thought Cameron said it would always pay to be in work. Seems this is not the case if you work for the public sector.

    I've just been on entitled to.

    We would be almost £75 a week better off if I didn't work and we lived in rented accomodation.

    With bills increasing ever further, I personally wouldn't be to bothered if I was one of the extra 310k public sector employees that have been lined up for the chop.

    I'll sell the house (maybe even sell to rent), claim IS/ESA or whatever, CTB, HB, CTC and live the life of riley. Certainly beats struggling into work everyday sufferring from unremitting chronic pain, depression, fatigue, unable to walk without a walking stick, at danger of falling with every step I take, only to be shat on from a great height by the very [STRIKE]Man[/STRIKE] !!!!!! who claimed everyone who worked would feel the benefit of it.
    [SIZE=-1]To equate judgement and wisdom with occupation is at best . . . insulting.
    [/SIZE]
  • oldvicar wrote: »
    Any one working in the public sector who is about over age 50 and has the opportunity to retire early really ought to think about doing so quickly.

    Take your pension now chaps, and in 4 or 5 years it will be worth maybe 20% more, due to inflation increases.

    Leave it a while and a final salary pension won't have gone up much if the salary hasn't increased.
    Rather than retire early, anyone on the run down to retirement who doesn't expect to get a higher paid job with their current employer should just leave their pension scheme pronto.

    The preserved pension will increase over the next few years by far more than those added years would earn them in pension, and their current pension schemes will close in 2015 in an case. They will save the increased pension contributions in the interim (or overpay their mortgage), then join the new scheme in 2015 if they consider that this will benefit them.
    "When the people fear the government there is tyranny, when the government fears the people there is liberty." - Thomas Jefferson
  • pqrdef
    pqrdef Posts: 4,552 Forumite
    Apparently the budget deficit in the last year of this Parliament is now predicted to be £79bn, which is higher than was predicted under Labour's spending plans.

    So the entire programme of spending cuts is cancelled out by the shortfall in expected tax revenue as a result of flatlining the economy.
    "It will take, five, 10, 15 years to get back to where we need to be. But it's no longer the individual banks that are in the wrong, it's the banking industry as a whole." - Steven Cooper, head of personal and business banking at Barclays, talking to Martin Lewis
  • ......and Italy is paying nearly 8% on its national credit card.

    Britain has been bad at exporting for a century now.

    We got a brief respite for 25 years, when we could cover the shortfalls by cashing in our "black gold" that had taken 8 million years to "manufacture" itself.

    We were first to devalued our currency but got stuck on the "J" curve, because other countries now are trying the same trick.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.